Везде
Sociology and Epistemology: the Need for Interaction
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Sociology and Epistemology: the Need for Interaction
Annotation
PII
S013216250002153-1-
DOI
10.31857/S013216250002153-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Lyudmila Mikeshina 
Affiliation: Moscow State Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue10
Pages
3-13
Abstract

The necessity o f interaction between sociology and social epistemology i s considered. I t i s shown that the cognitive and research potential of modern sociology may be significantly expanded and deepened by addressing epistemological problems – values, prerequisite forms of knowledge, various types of communications, as well as the study of non-Marxist theories of society, including phenomenology. The necessity and legitimacy of reducing the level of abstraction of the subject and the object of cognition in sociology are substantiated. It is shown that among methodological and epistemological problems of Marxism there is still a number of topics important for sociology and other social sciences and humanities. These include methods of hypostatizations that Bourdieu found in Marx; “historicism,” according to K. Popper and D. M. Petrushevsky; methodology of individualism and collectivism – concept of S. G. Kirdina-Chandler. The necessary presence in sociology of values and methods of their introduction: interpretation, representation, categorization, and convention, – is investigated. Epistemological approach to various types of communications, communicative rationality in general is presented. The role of A. Schutz’s phenomenological teaching, insufficiently studied in Russia, is discussed.

Keywords
sociology, social epistemology, hypostasis, historicism, values, interpretation, representation, communicative rationality, phenomenological teaching
Received
29.11.2018
Date of publication
29.11.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
542
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013216250002153-1-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 02.11.2018
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Bourdieu P. (1994) Nachala. Choses Dites. Moscow: Socio-Logos. (In Russ.)

2. Gottfried P. (2009) The Strange Death of Marxism. Moscow: IRISEN, Mysl’. (In Russ.)

3. Kirdina S. G. (2000) Institutional Matrices and Development of Russia. Moscow: TEIS. (In Russ.)

4. Kirdina S. G. (2013) To Rethink the Principle of Methodological Individualism. Moscow: IE RAN. (In Russ.)

5. Kirdina-Chandler S. G. (2014) Institutional Matrices and Development of Russia. Moscow- Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)

6. Mikeshina L. A. (2010) Epistemological justification of hypostasis and reification. Voprosy Filosofii [Question of Philosophy]. No. 12: 44-54. (In Russ.)

7. Mikeshina L. A. (2017) Phenomenology and enrichment of concepts in epistemology. Voprosy Filosofii [Question of Philosophy]. No. 2: 85—94. (In Russ.)

8. Popper K. (1992) Open society and its enemies. Vol. II. Moscow: Kulturnaya initsiativa. (In Russ.)

9. Popper K. (1993) Poverty of Historicism. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

10. Romanovskiy N. V. (2018) Metatheorizing in sociology: discourse and forecast. Sotsiologitsheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 127-135. (In Russ.)

11. Schutz A. (2004) Selected Works: the World Shining with Sense. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

12. Smirnova N. M. (1978) New Directions in Sociological Theory. Moscow. (In Russ.)

13. Smirnova N. M. (2009) Social Phenomenology in the Study of Modern Society. Moscow: Canon+, ROOI Rehabilitation (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate