Russian Universities: Organizational Specifics and Development Benchmarks Choice
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Russian Universities: Organizational Specifics and Development Benchmarks Choice
Annotation
PII
S013216250003170-0-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E. Popova 
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
V. Klimova
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
63-72
Abstract

Evolution of the research issues of local self-government in Russian sociology from the last third of the 20th century to the present is traced in the article. Methodology of research – analysis of texts of articles, monographs, dissertations. Three stages of evolution of representations of the national sociologists about local self-government are offered: soviet, post- soviet, modern. Tendencies of research evolution are defined: development of different approaches to the study of local selfgovernment; growth of interdisciplinary research; complex analysis of municipal practice; perception of individuals and local communities as subjects of governance (self-government); formation of the objectsubject area of sociological analysis of self-governing practices. Specifics of the sociological approach to the study of local self-government are shown.  

Keywords
Russian sociology, local self-government, evolution of research issues of local selfgovernment, sociological approach to the analysis of local self-government
Received
27.12.2018
Date of publication
09.01.2019
Number of purchasers
10
Views
585
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013216250003170-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Abankina I., Aleskerov F., Belousova V., Gokhberg l., Zinkovsky K., Kiselgof S., Petrushchenko V., Shvydun S. (2013) Typology and Analysis of Scientific and Educational Performance of RussianUniversities. FORSAYT [FORSIGHT]. Vol. 7. No. 3: 48–63. (In Russ.)

2. Carimova A.B. (2016). Latent Functions of International Educational Rankings. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 110–120. (In Russ.)

3. Ivanova N.L., Popova E.P. (2017) Professionals and the Problem of Implementing Innovation in University. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Questions of Education]. No. 1: 184–206. (In Russ.)

4. Kalmykov N.N., Satyr’ T.S. (2016). The Russian Higher Education: Experts view. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 91–97. (In Russ.)

5. Kehm B.M. (2013) Universities as Specific and Incomplete Organizations? New Theories of ‘Universities as Organizations’. In: Presentation at the 4-th International Conference «University Traditions: A Resource or A Burden?» Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 26-28 September.

6. Kehm B.M. (2016) Universities’ Ratings – Impact and Unforessen Side-effects. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 71–80. (In Russ.)

7. Kliatchko T.L. (2016) Higher Education: Bigger, Better, or Cheaper? Demoscope Weekly. Iss. January 1–24. No. 669-670. URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2016/0669/print.php (accessed 29.02.2016). (In Russ.)

8. Knyazev Y. A., Drantusova N.V. (2014) European Scales and Institutional Transformation in Russian Higher Education. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Questions of Education]. No. 2: 109–131. (In Russ.)

9. Krücken G., Meier F. (2006) Turning the University into an Organizational Actor. In: Drory G., etc. (eds) Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford Univ. Press: 241–257.

10. Kuzminov Y., Semyonov D., Frumin I. (2013). An Uncompleted Transition: From a State Plan to a Master Plan. Otechestvennye zapiski [Domestic Notes]. No. 4 (55). URL: http://www.strana-oz.ru/2013/4/ nezavershennyy-perehod-ot-gosplana---k-master-planu (accessed 04.02.2016). (In Russ.)

11. Mintzberg H. (2002). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Saint-Petersburg: Piter (In Russ.)

12. Musselin C. (2006) Are Universities Specific Organizations? In: Krücken G., Kosmützky A., Torka M. Towards a Multiversity? Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag: 63–84.

13. Pugh D.S., Hickson D.J. (1994) Great Writers on Organizations. Moscow: Link (In Russ.)

14. Parsons T. (2002) The Social System. Moscow: Akadem. prospekt. (In Russ.)

15. Popova E.P. (2004) Problems of Criteria of Organizational Development: Survival or Effectiveness. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 108–116. (In Russ.)

16. Popova E. (2012) Efficiency as a Criterion of the Organizational Development of Universities and Consumers of Educational Services. Voprosy upravlenia [Management Issues]. No. 4: 171–176. (In Russ.)

17. Prigozhin A. (2003) Methods Aimed at Organizational Development. Moscow: MTSFER. (In Russ.)

18. Scherbina V.V., Popova E.P. (2011) Organizational Development: Theory and Practice. Moscow: Shk. izd. i media biznesa. (In Russ.).

19. Sherbina V.V., Popova E.P. (1996) Contemporary Structural Changes Conceptions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 1: 98–107. (In Russ.)

20. Sokolov M. (2017) The Myth of University Strategy. Market Niches and Organizational Careers ofRussian Universities. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Questions of Education]. No. 2: 36–73. (In Russ.)

21. Teichler U. (2015). Diversity and Diversification of Higher Education: Trends, Challenges and Policies. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Questions of Education]. No. 1: 14–38. (In Russ.)

22. Whitley R. (2008) Universities as Strategic Actors: Limitations and Variations. In: Engwall L., Weaire D. (eds) The University in the Market. London: Portland Press: 22–37.

23. Zemtsov S.P., Eremkin V.A., Barinova V.A. (2015). Factors of Attractiveness of the Leading Russian Universities Overview of Literature and Econometric Analysis of the Leading Universities. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Questions of Education]. No. 4: 201–233. (In Russ.)

24. Zubova L.G., Andreeva O.N., Antropova O.A. (2008). Graduating College Students' Orientations toward Scientific Research Activity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 119–213. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate