1. Безрученко В.А. Социально-философский анализ класса технократов как комплексной элиты будущего // Вестник Омского университета. 2014. № 3. С. 80–81.

2. Бочарова С. Две трети регионов стали менее устойчивыми при губернаторах-технократах. Назначение таких руководителей снимает напряженность лишь временно, считают эксперты // Ведомости. 2019. 10 марта.

3. Кокошин А.А. Технократия, технократы и неотехнократы. М.: Издательство ЛКИ, 2009.

4. Коломийцев В.Ф. Технократия V Республики // Вопросы истории. 1979. № 6. С. 78–85.

5. Левкина А.О. Коннотации технократии в дискурсе о формах инновационного развития общества // Социум и власть. 2017. № 6. С. 13–20.

6. Ципко А.С. О запросе на разум // Полис. Политические исследования. 2009. № 4. С. 179–181.

7. Abraham J., Sheppard J. Democracy, Technocracy and the Secret State of Medicine Control: Expert and None-expert Perspective // Science, Technology & Human Values. 1997. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 139–167.

8. Azrael J. R. Managerial Power and Soviet Politics. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1966.

9. Beckwith B. P. Government by Experts. The Next Stage in Political Evolution. N. Y.: Exposition Press, 1972.

10. Bell D. The Post-Industrial Society. The Evolution of an Idea // Survey. 1971. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 102–168.

11. Bertsou E. and Pastorella G. Technocratic attitudes: a citizens’ perspective of expert decision-making // West European Politics. 2017. Vol.40. Issue 2. P. 430–458.

12. Bucchi M. Beyond Technocracy. Science, Politics and Citizens. N. Y.: Springer-Verlag, 2009.

13. Caramani D. Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government // American Political Science Review. 2017. Vol. 111. No.1. P. 54–67.

14. Centeno M.A. The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy // Theory and society. 1993. Vol. 22. Iss. 3. P. 307–335.

15. Corrias L. The empty place of European power: Contested democracy and the technocratic Threat // European Law Journal. 2017. Vol. 23. Iss. 6. P.482–494.

16. Costa Pinto A et al. Beyond Party Government? Technocratic Trends in Society and in the Executive // Technocratic Ministers and Political Leadership in European Democracies. Ed. by Costa A. et al. Cham: Springer Nature, 2018.

17. Covin J. G. et al. Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs technocratic mode: structural and environmental considerations // Journal of Business Research. 2001. Vol. 52. Iss. 1. P. 51–67.

18. Esmark A. Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Technocracy? An Old Framework for a New Analysis of Administrative Reforms in the Governance Era // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2017. P. 501–516.

19. Gilley B. Technocracy and democracy as spheres of justice in public policy // Policy Sciences. 2017. Vol. 50. Iss. 1. P. 9–22.

20. Kickbusch I. Politics or Technocracy – What Next for Global Health? // International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 201–204.

21. Lumer H. On «Postindustrial Society» // Political Affairs. 1973. Vol. 52. No.1.

22. Olson R.G. Scientism and Technocracy in the Twentieth Century: The Legacy of Scientific Management. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington book, 2016.

23. Putnam R. D. Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies. Empirical Assessment of the Theory of Technocracy // Comparative political Studies. 1977. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 383–412.

24. Ribbhagen C. What Makes a Technocrat? Explaining Variation in Technocratic Thinking among Elite Bureaucrats // Public Policy and Administration. 2011. Vol. 26. No.1. P. 21–44.

25. Ryan Ph. «Technocracy», democracy… and corruption and trust // Policy Science. 2018. Vol. 51. Iss. 1. P. 131–139.

26. Sanchez-Cuenca I. From a Deficit of Democracy to a Technocratic Order The Postcrisis Debate on Europe // Annual Review of Political Science. 2017. Vol. 20. P. 351–369.

27. Sawyer S.W., Feldman S.L. Technocracy Versus Reality: Perceptions in Solar Policy // Policy Sciences. 1981. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 459–472.

28. Williams M.E. Market Reform, Technocrats and Institutional Innovation // World Development. 2002. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 395–412.