Jürgen Habermas’ Post-marxism and Dialectics of Social Development
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Jürgen Habermas’ Post-marxism and Dialectics of Social Development
Annotation
PII
S013216250005479-9-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Dmitry V. Ivanov 
Occupation: Prof., St. Petersburg State University
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: St. Petersburg, Russia
Edition
Pages
26-36
Abstract

The article is dedicated to analysis of J. Habermas’ contribution to sociological theorizing with special focus on his conception of the modern society development. The neo-Marxist and post-Marxist phases in his intellectual career have been characterized. Habermas’ integrative paradigm and his two-level theory of society are interpreted as a new perspective on goals and indicators of social development. Being presented as foundations of sociality, communicative rationality and communicative action correspond to current processes of social development, but in Habermas’ theory they are used to deter social changes and to defend values and institutions of the previous centuries from the past. Conception of the life-world defense against the system expansion is a kind of conservative utopia. Under today’s virtualization and post-virtualization conditions the life-world is not conservative reality of everyday routine but augmented reality constructed by creative and mobile communications and supported by network and flow structures. In such augmented social reality, communicative action creates meanings, symbolic structures legitimating purposive-rational action and the system.

Keywords
Habermas, critical theory, communicative action, social development, dialectics
Received
25.06.2019
Date of publication
26.06.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
608
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013216250005479-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 13.06.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Ivanov D.V. (1999) Critical Theory and Virtualization of Society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaiya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 32–40. (In Russ.)

2. Habermas J. (1992) Die Moderne – ein unvollendentes Projekt. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. No. 4: 40–52. (In Russ.)

3. Baudrillard J. (1981) Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Galilée.

4. Habermas J. (1962) Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

5. Habermas J. (1968a) Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

6. Habermas J. (1968b) Technik und Wissenschaft als «Ideologie». Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

7. Habermas J. (1973) Legitimitätsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

8. Habermas J. (1976) Zur Rekonstruktion des historischen Materialismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

9. Habermas J. (1980) Die Moderne – ein unvollendentes Projekt. Die Zeit. 19 Sept.

10. Habermas J. (1981a) Modernity versus Postmodernity. New German Critique. No. 22: 3–14.

11. Habermas J. (1981b) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1, 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

12. Habermas J. (1985) Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

13. Habermas J. (1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

14. Habermas J., Luhmann N. (1971) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Was leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

15. Horkheimer M., Adorno T. (1947) Dialektik der Aufklärung. Amsterdam: Querido.

16. Horkheimer M. (1988) Traditionelle und Kritische Theorie. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. 4: Schriften 1936–1941. Frankfurt am Main: Fisher Verlag.

17. Kellner D. (1989) Critical Theory, Marxism, and Modernity. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate