FUNDAMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY AND PRACTICE: PROBLEMS AND TENDENCIES OF INTERACTION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
FUNDAMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY AND PRACTICE: PROBLEMS AND TENDENCIES OF INTERACTION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
The problem of interaction between fundamental psychological science and practice is analyzed. Two main approaches to explanation of their rupture are considered. According to the fi rst one, the reason is due to specifi c character of knowledge obtained by the present-day experimental psychology. According to the second one, the structure of fundamental psychology, its adherence to natural-science standards is the basis for its separation from the practice. It is shown that modern psychology creates local models of phenomena for practical tasks solving. At the same time conversion to more optimal interaction with practice is connected with synthetic models elaboration. Possibilities of practice at the macro-psychological level connected with diagnostics and optimization of psychological state of society in toto are analyzed.
Keywords
Fundamental psychology, psychological practice, interaction, type of scientifi c knowledge, experiment, local and synthetic model, psychological constructivism
Date of publication
03.05.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
720
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000616-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 09.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Vasilyuk F.E. Metodologicheskij smysl psikholo-gicheskogo skhizisa//Voprosy psikhologii. 1996. № 6. S. 25-40.
  2. Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologiya upravlencheskogo vzai-modejstviya. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2004.
  3. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii. M.: Nauka, 1984.
  4. Padun M.A., Tarabrina N.V. Kognitivno-lichnost-nye aspekty perezhivaniya travmaticheskogo stres-sa//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2004. T. 25. № 5. S. 5-15.
  5. Ponomarev Ya.A. Metodologicheskoe vvedenie v psi-khologiyu. M.: Nauka, 1980.
  6. Rozin V.M. Psikhologicheskaya real'nost' kak pro-blema tsekhovogo samoopredeleniya//Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2010. T. 7. № 1. S. 90-103.
  7. Rozin V.M., Rozin M.V. O psikhologii i ne tol'ko o nej//Znanie-sila. 1993. № 4.
  8. Sergienko E.A. Rannee kognitivnoe razvitie: no-vyj vzglyad. M.: Izd-vo Institut psikhologii RAN, 2006.
  9. Sosland A.I. Psikhoterapiya v seti protivorechij//Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2006. T. 3. №1. S. 46-67.
  10. Stepin V.S. Ot klassicheskoj k postneklassiche-skoj nauke (izmenenie osnovanij i tsennostnykh orientirov)//Tsennostnye aspekty razvitiya nau-ki. M., 1990. S. 152-166.
  11. Khekkhauzen Kh. Motivatsiya i deyatel'nost'. SPb.: Pi-ter; M.: Smysl, 2003.
  12. Shvarts Sh. Kul'turnye tsennostnye orientatsii: priroda i sledstviya natsional'nykh razlichij//Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2008. T. 5. № 2. S. 37-67.
  13. Yurevich A. V. Psikhologiya i metodologiya//Psikho-logicheskij zhurnal. 2000. № 5. S. 35-47.
  14. Yurevich A.V., Ushakov D.V., Tsapenko I.P. Otsenka psikhologicheskogo sostoyaniya rossijskogo obsche-stva: kolichestvennyj podkhod//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2007. T. 28. № 4. S. 23-34.
  15. Yasin E.G. Issledovanie kul'turnykh tsennostej -obschee delo sotsial'nykh nauk//Psikhologiya. Zhur-nal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2008. T. 5. № 2. S. 25-36.
  16. Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2001.
  17. Lynn R., Vanhanen T. IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2002.
  18. McClelland D.C. The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1961.
  19. Sternberg R.J. Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate