Везде
EMOTIONAL EFFECTS OF POSITIVE FORMS OF COMMUNICATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
EMOTIONAL EFFECTS OF POSITIVE FORMS OF COMMUNICATION
Annotation
PII
S0321-50750000617-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana Ionova 
Abstract
The article discusses the problem of emotional significance of a positive form of speech. Based on the methodology of emotions linguistics, linguoecology, communicative linguistics and the methods of description, comparison and discourse analysis, the author distinguishes some types of speech situations that demonstrate visible differences between positive expression of emotions and their content and the pragmatic effect. The difference between the notions of “positive communication” and “positive form of communication” is demonstrated. Special attention is given to the following types of positive emotional communication: tolerant emotional communication, emotional emphasis, emotional neglect, and emotional tabooing. The utterances in situations of real and textual communication demonstrate negative effects of statements expressed in a positive form and identify the specifics of positive forms of emotional communication in comparison with rational communication.
Keywords
emotion, emotiveness, communication, communication ecology, emotional and rational communication, positive form of speech, negative effect of speech
Date of publication
01.01.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1014
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Baunov A. Oskorbil li Putin kitajtsev shal'yu. 2014. URL: http://slon.ru/world/etiket-1182981.xhtml.
 2. Vezhbitskaya A. Diskurs i kul'tura // Zhanry rechi. Sbornik nauchnykh statej. Vyp. 3. Saratov: Izd-vo GosUNTs «Kolledzh», 2002. S. 118-158. 
 3. Galyashina E.I. Lingvisticheskaya bezopasnost' rechevoj kommunikatsii // Nauchnyj zhurnal GLEhDIS. URL: http://www.rusexpert.ru/magazine/034.htm.
 4. Ionova S.V. Rol' ehmotsij v protsesse tekstoobrazovaniya: strukturno-semanticheskij aspekt // Ehmotivnyj kod yazyka i ego realizatsiya: kollektivnaya monografiya. Volgograd: Peremena, 2003. S. 120-134. 
 5. Ionova S.V., Shakhovskij V.I. Chelovek i ego yazykovaya sreda: ehkolingvisticheskij aspekt // Antropologiya yazyka. The Antropology of Language: sb. statej. Vyp. 2. M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2012. S. 137-149. 
 6. Lektorskij V.A. O tolerantnosti, plyuralizme i krititsizme // Vopr. filos. 1997. № 11. S. 46-54. 
 7. Leont'ev V.V. Kul'turno-obuslovlennye stsenarii «PRAISE», «FLATTERY», «COMPLIMENT» v anglijskoj lingvokul'ture (stat'ya) // Aziya v Evrope: vzaimodejstvie tsivilizatsij: nauchnaya konferentsiya «Yazyk, kul'tura, ehtnos v globalizovannom mire: na styke tsivilizatsij i vremen»: Materialy mezhd. kongressa. V 2-kh chastyakh. Ehlista: Izd-vo Kalmytskogo gos. un-ta, 2005. Ch. 1. S. 97-101. 
 8. Litvak M.E. Komandovat' ili podchinyat'sya? Izd. 4-e. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2004.
 9. Peskov D.S. Peskov ob'yasnil postupok Putina, ukryvshego platkom pervuyu ledi Kitaya // Vzglyad: delovye novosti, 11 noyabrya 2014. URL: http://vz.ru/news/2014/11/11/714849.html.
 10. Semenova N.V. Lingvisticheskaya diagnostika invektivnogo slova: Avtoref. diss.. kand. filol. nauk. M., 2008. 
 11. Sirotinina O.B. Nekotorye razmyshleniya po povodu terminov «rechevoj zhanr» i «ritoricheskij zhanr» // Zhanry rechi - 2. Saratov, 1999. S. 26-30. 
 12. Targakova M.V. Psikhologiya obidy // Psikhologiya tret'ego tysyacheletiya. URL: psyfactor.org/ lib/touchiness.htm.
 13. Teliya V.N. Mekhanizmy ehkspressivnoj okraski yazykovykh edinits // Chelovecheskij faktor v yazyke: yazykovye mekhanizmy ehkspressivnosti. M.: Nauka, 1991. S. 36-67.
 14. Trufanova I.V. Ehkologichnye i neehkologichnye rechevye akty v sfere ehmotsional'nogo // Ehmotivnaya lingvoehkologiya v sovremennom kommunikativnom prostranstve. Volgograd: Peremena, 2013. S. 260-274. 
 15. Shakhovskij V.I. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya ehmotsij. M.: Gnozis, 2008. 
 16. Shakhovskij V.I. Ehmotsional'naya tolerantnost' v mezhpersonal'nom rechevom obschenii // Rusistika. Vyp. 5-6. Kiev: VPTs «Kievskij universitet», 2006. S. 13-19. 
 17. Volek B. Emotive Signs in Languade and Semantic Functioning of Derived Nouns in Russian. Amsterdam - Filadelfia, 1987.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate