Библиография
1. Bradford S., Grieco P., Hufbauer G. The Payoff to America from Global Integration // The United States and the World Economy: Foreign Economic Policy for the Next Decade. Ed. by Bergsten F. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2005. P. 65-109.
2. Согласно данным Национального бюро экономических исследований, в период 1989–2009 гг. показатели ориентированных на экспорт производств в США были выше среднеотраслевого показателя более чем на 10% по уровню заработной платы и на 30% выше по уровню производительности.
3. Economic Impact of Trade Agreements under Trade Authorities Procedures, USITC, 2016. P. 122, 129, 138, 143.
4. Huntington S. The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991, 366 p.
5. 2018 Economic Report of the President. P. 221; 2017 National Security Strategy of the United States. P. 20.
6. McArthur J., Rasmussen K. Who Funds Which Multilaterals? Global Views paper No. 8, The Brookings Institution, December 2017.
7. 2018 WTO Annual Report. P. 200-201. The World Bank IBRD-IDA. Allocation of Votes by Organization. Available at: www.worldbank.org/en/about/leadership/votingpowers (accessed: 20.09.2018); International Monetary Fund, IMF Members' Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx (accessed 20.09.2018).
8. 2018 Trade Policy Agenda and 2017 Annual Report, USTR, March 2018. P. 25.
9. Stokes B. Republicans, Especially Trump Supporters, See Free Trade Deals as Bad for U.S. Pew Research Center, Fact Tank, News in the Numbers, March 31, 2016. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/31/republicans-especially-trump-supporters-see-free-trade-deals-as-bad-for-u-s/ (accessed: 20.12.2017).
10. По оценкам Комиссии по международной торговле США, через 15 лет после вступления в силу договора прирост реального дохода составил бы 0,23%, ВВП – 0,15%, занятости – 0,07%, экспорта – 1,0%, импорта – 1,1%, наибольший прирост мог наблюдаться в сельском хозяйстве и пищевой промышленности – 0,5% и в сфере услуг – 0,1%, тогда как в промышленном производстве, добыче природных ресурсов и энергетике выпуск снизился бы на 0,1%. Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 2016. P. 21.
11. U.S.-EU Joint Report on TTIP Progress, USTR, January 17, 2017.
12. USITC The Year in Trade 2017, August 2018. P. 127-128.
13. Ibid. P. 26.
14. Ibid. P. 24.
15. Setser B. The Right and the Wrong Ways to Adjust the U.S. – China Trade Balance. Council on Foreign Relations, 25.06.2018. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/blog/right-and-wrong-ways-adjust-us-china-trade-balance (accessed: 20.09.2018).
16. Acemoglu D., Autor D., Dorn D., Hanson G., Price B. Import Competition and the Great U.S. Employment Saga of the 2000s. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 34, No. S1 (Part 2, January 2016). P. S141-S198. Available at: http://economics.mit.edu/files/9811 (accessed 01.11.2018).
17. Pauley L. China Takes the Lead in UN Peacekeeping. The Diplomat, 17.04.2018. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2018/04/china-takes-the-lead-in-un-peacekeeping/ (accessed: 01.06.2018).
18. Muro M., Whiton J., Maxim R. How China’s Proposed Tariffs Could Affect U.S. Workers and Industries. The Brookings Institution, April 9, 2018.
19. World Trade Report 2017: Trade, Technology and Jobs. Р. 155.
Комментарии
Сообщения не найдены