RAS History & PhilologyАзия и Африка сегодня Asia and Africa Today

  • ISSN (Print) 0321-5075
  • ISSN (Online) 2782-2389

Digital Sovereignty of African Countries: Threats and Ways to Protect Them

PII
S0321507525020023-1
DOI
10.31857/S0321507525020023
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Abstract
The article analyzes the consequences of digitalization of the African continent in the context of technological, economic and political rivalry between the United States and China, and Africa’s growing dependence on external partners. The central issue is data security, the process of using the data is considered by the experts through the concepts of “data colonialism”, “digital colonialism” and “digital sovereignty”. The author notes that, on the one hand, digital technologies can contribute to increased productivity, dynamic growth, structural changes and the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals on the African continent; on the other hand, they create new problems and challenges. It is concluded that the digital sovereignty of the states of the African continent, in addition to technological and economic problems, is hampered by competition in cyberspace of extraregional actors, primarily the United States, China and the EU, in the regulatory and legal field, which is taking on a political and ideological nature. It is extremely difficult to achieve digital sovereignty, understood as the right of states to regulate and exercise control over technologies, services and digital data used on sovereign territory in the current circumstances due to the fact that overcoming of quite a few issues is impossible without investment and participation of Western and Asian digital giants, which, in the context of active competition for Africa, are themselves the cause of them.
Keywords
Африка цифровой колониализм цифровой суверенитет суверенитет данных цифровая экономика защита данных цифровое противостояние
Date of publication
19.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
2

References

  1. 1. Calzati S. 2022. ‘Data sovereignty’ or ‘Data colonialism’? Exploring the Chinese involvement in Africa’s ICTs: a document review on Kenya. Journal of Contemporary African Studies. Vol. 40, Iss. 2. Pp. 270–285. DOI: 10.1080/02589001.2022.2027351
  2. 2. Кутюр С., Тоупин С. Что означает понятие «суверенитет» в цифровом мире? Вестник международных организаций. 2020. Т. 15. № 4. С. 48–69. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-04-03
  3. 3. Couture S., Toupin S. 2020. What Does the Notion of “Sovereignty” Mean When Referring to the Digital? International Organisations Research Journal. Vol. 15, № 4. Pp. 48–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1996- 7845-2020-04-03
  4. 4. Floridi L. 2020. The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology. Vol. 33, Pp. 369–378.
  5. 5. Polatin-Reuben D., Wright J. 2014. An Internet with BRICS Characteristics: Data Sovereignty and the Balkanisation of the Internet. In: IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computational Intelligence. University of Oxford.
  6. 6. Pinto R.Á. 2018. Digital sovereignty or digital colonialism? New tensions of privacy, security and national policies. International Journal on Human Rights. Iss. 27. https://sur.conectas.org/en/digital-sovereignty-or-digital-colonialism/
  7. 7. O’Neil C. 2016. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown.
  8. 8. Abebe R., Aruleba K., Birhane A., Kingsley S. 2021. Narratives and counternarratives on data sharing in Africa. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445897
  9. 9. Dencik L., Hintz A., Cable J. 2016. Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society. 3 (2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951716679678
  10. 10. Kitchin R. The Data Revolution: Big data, Open data, Data infrastructures and their consequences. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE, 2014. 222 p.
  11. 11. Metcalf J., Crawford K. Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. January 2016. Big Data & Society. 3(1). DOI: 10.1177/2053951716650211
  12. 12. Грибанова В.В., Усачева В.В. Неоколониализм в сфере образования и СМИ в Африке: некоторые итоги перехода от культурного к цифровому империализму. Электронный научно-образовательный журнал «История». 2023. Т. 14.
  13. 13. Gribanova V.V., Usacheva V.V. 2023. Neocolonialism in the field of education and media in Africa: some results of the transition from cultural to digital imperialism. Electronic scientific and educational journal “History”. Vol. 14. (In Russ.)
  14. 14. Панцерев К.А. Страны Африки южнее Сахары в цифровую эпоху: к вопросу обеспечения информационного суверенитета. Азия и Африка сегодня. 2019. № 10. С. 10–16.
  15. 15. Pantzerev K.A. 2019. Sub-Saharan African Countries in the Digital Age: Towards Ensuring Information Sovereignty. Asia and Africa today. № 10. Pp. 10–16. (In Russ.)
  16. 16. Zuboff Sh. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019. 704 p.
  17. 17. Couldry N., Mejias U. 2018. Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television and New Media. https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/technology-colonialism
  18. 18. Kwet М. 2019. Digital colonialism: US empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class. Vol. 60. Iss. 4. DOI: 10.1177/0306396818823172
  19. 19. Цветкова Н., Сытник А. Цифровое противостояние США и КНР: экономическое и политическое измерения. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2023. № 11. C. 15–23.
  20. 20. Tsvetkova N., Sytnik A. 2023. Digital Confrontation between the USA and China: Economic and Political Dimensions. World Economy and International Relations. № 11. Pp. 15–23. (In Russ.)
  21. 21. Сафронов Э.Е. Трансформации капитализма в XXI веке: концепция «надзорного капитализма» Шошаны Зубофф. Социологические исследования. 2021. № 4. С. 165–172. (In Russ.)
  22. 22. Safronov E.E. 2021. Transformations of capitalism in the 21st century: Shoshana Zuboff’s concept of “surveillance capitalism”. Sociological Studies. № 4. Pp. 165–172. (In Russ.)
  23. 23. Couldry N., Mejias U.A. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press, 2019. 352 p.
  24. 24. Birhane B. 2020. Algorithmic Colonization of Africa. SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society. Vol. 17. Iss. 2. DOI: 10.2966/scrip.170220.389
  25. 25. Birhane A. 2017. Descartes was wrong: “A person is a person through other persons”’. Aeon. https://aeon.co/ideas/descartes-was-wrong-a-person-is-a-person-through-other-persons
  26. 26. Makulilo A.B. 2012. Privacy and data protection in Africa: A state of the art. International Data Privacy Law. 2 (3). Pp. 163–178. DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ips014
  27. 27. Makulilo A.B., Mophethe K. 2016. Privacy and Data Protection in Lesotho. African Data Privacy Laws. Springer Cham. Pp. 337–347. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47317-8
  28. 28. Babalola O. 2023. Data Protection Legal Regime and Data Governance in Africa: An Overview. In: Ndemo B., Ndung’u N., Odhiambo S., Shimeles A. (eds). Data Governance and Policy in Africa. Information Technology and Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24498-8_4
  29. 29. Цифровой поворот в международных отношениях: как новые технологии меняют мировую политику и науку о ней. Под ред. М.А.Сучкова, И.В.Болговой. М.: МГИМО – Университет, 2023. 232 с.
  30. 30. The Digital Turn in International Relations: How New Technologies Are Changing World Politics and the Science of It. 2023. Ed. by M.A.Suchkov, I.V.Bolgova. Moscow, 2023. 232 p.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library