Structure of relationships within the " strategic triangle” (US-China-Russia)
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Structure of relationships within the " strategic triangle” (US-China-Russia)
Annotation
PII
S207054760011657-9-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir Batyuk 
Occupation: Head Of the center for military and political research
Affiliation:
Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
National Research University – Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Abstract

Even during the cold war, the strategic triangle of the USA-USSR-China was formed, where the most advantageous positions – at the top of the triangle – were occupied by the United States, which maintained better relations with the Soviet Union and the people's Republic of China than the latter – with each other. However, after the collapse of the bipolar world, the relations between the United States and Russia, on the one hand, and the United States and China, on the other, faced a number of serious problems, primarily of a military and political nature. At the same time, over the past 30 years, the confrontation between Moscow and Beijing has been replaced by a strategic partnership between the two giants – a partnership that is objectively anti-American in nature. These changes changed the nature of the" strategic triangle " of America-China-Russia in the 21st century. 

Keywords
Strategic triangle, economic cooperation, military conflict, regional problems
Acknowledgment
The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, the project "Strategic triangle of the USA-China-Russia: challenges and prospects for Russia's national security", No 19-014-00009
Received
05.08.2020
Date of publication
25.09.2020
Number of purchasers
25
Views
4249
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S207054760011657-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.09.2020
Cite Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Batyuk V.I. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij. Uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata. – M.: Yurajt, 2016. s.345.

2. Batyuk V.I. Amerikano-kitajskie otnosheniya: vozvraschenie kholodnoj vojny? SShA & Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2019. №5. S.22-38. DOI: 10.31857/S032120680004909-3

3. Kissinger H. Diplomacy. – New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994. P.719

4. Balakin V., Syaoin' L. KNR i SSSR v 1960-e – 1980-e gody: ot konfrontatsii k ravnopravnomu sotrudnichestvu. Vestrik YuUrGU. Seriya «Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye nauki». 2016. T. 16, № 1. S.13-14

5. U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, December 2019. An official website of the United States government. Available at: https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/us-international-trade-goods-and-services-december-2019 (accessed 17.03.2020).

6. Kokh A., Aven P. Andrej Kozyrev: nastoyaschij kamikadze. Forbes. 28.09.2011. URL: http://www.forbes.ru/ekonomika/lyudi/74501-andrei-kozyrev-nastoyashchii-kamikadze (accessed 12.03.2020).

7. Batyuk V.I. «Novaya rossijsko-amerikanskaya gonka yadernykh vooruzhenij». SShA & Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2020, № 2. S.78-96. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300008242-6

8. Veber Yu., Krikovich A. Izmotat' i peresidet'. Istoki amerikanskogo povedeniya v otnoshenii Rossii. Rossiya v global'noj politike. 2016. №2. Available at: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/Izmotat-i-peresidet-18030 (accessed 12.03.2020).

9. Biden J. Biden Says Weakened Russia Will Bend to U.S. Wall Street Journal. July 25, 2009. A1.

10. Zlobin N.V. Dve storony odnoj medali. Rossijskaya gazeta. 24 fevralya 2010 g.

11. Vystuplenie i otvety na voprosy Ministra inostrannykh del Rossii S.V.Lavrova v khode vstrechi so studentami i professorsko-prepodavatel'skim sostavom MGIMO, Moskva, 3 sentyabrya 2018 goda. Available at: http://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/3336393 (accessed 12.03.2020).

12. Tsit. po: Batyuk V. I. Amerikano-kitajskie otnosheniya: vozvraschenie kholodnoj vojny? SShA & Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2019. № 5. C. 22-38. DOI: 10.31857/S032120680004909-3

13. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. December 2017.

14. Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States.

15. Blackwill R., and Gordon P. Containing Russia How to Respond to Moscow’s Intervention in U.S. Democracy and Growing Geopolitical Challenge. – Council on Foreign Relations. Council Special Report No. 80. January 2018. P.3-4.

16. Russia and the United States in the evolving world order: [monograph]: [na angl. yaz.] / [Anatoly Torkunov, Norma C. Noonan, Tatiana Shakleina and others]; edited by Anatoly Torkunov, Norma C. Noonan, Tatiana Shakleina; Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University). – Moscow: MGIMO University, 2018. P.50.

17. National Security Strategy. 2010. May 2010. P/44.

18. The National Military Strategy of the United States of America. 2011. Redefining America’s Military Leadership. – Washington, D.C., February 2011.

19. Statement of Admiral Robert F. Willard, U.S. Navy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command before the Senate Armed Services Committee on U.S. Pacific Command Posture. 12 April 2011.

20. Mullen M. A Step Toward Trust With China. The New York Times. July 25, 2011. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/opinion/26Mullen.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&pagewanted=print (accessed 12.03.2020).

21. Statement of Admiral Robert F. Willard, U.S. Navy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command before the Senate Armed Services Committee on U.S. Pacific Command Posture. 12 April 2011.

22. Statement of Admiral Philip S. Davidson, U.S. Navy Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command before the Senate Armed Services Committee on U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Posture 12 February 2019.

23. Batyuk V.I. Vozmozhnyj amerikano-kitajskij konflikt v otsenkakh amerikanskikh spetsialistov. // Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke [Ehlektronnyj resurs], 2017, № 1. Available at: http://www.rusus.ru/?act=read&id=541. (accessed 12.03.2020). DOI: 10.18254/S207054760005202-9

24. Pei M. Opasnaya tajvan'skaya politika Kitaya. Project Syndicate. January 11, 2019. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-taiwan-policy-conflict-with-america-by-minxin-pei-2019-01/russian (accessed 12.03.2020).

25. US Trade Deficit with China and Why It's So High. The Real Reason American Jobs Are Going to China. Available at: https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-china-trade-deficit-causes-effects-and-solutions-3306277 (accessed 12.03.2020).

26. Chellaney B. The End of America’s China Fantasy. Project Syndicate. Oct. 22, 2018. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-china-policy-trade-war-competition-by-brahma-chellaney-2018-10 (accessed 12.03.2020).

27. Paal D. How US-China disputes on trade, Taiwan and the South China Sea are driven by Washington’s new generation. South China Morning Post. Wednesday, 10 October, 2018. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2167785/how-us-china-disputes-trade-taiwan-and-south (accessed 12.03.2020).

28. Luzyanin S.G. Rossiya – Kitaj: formirovanie obnovlyonnogo mira. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 2018, s. 13.

29. Lukin A.V. Vozvyshayuschijsya Kitaj i buduschee Rossii (Raboty o Kitae i rossijsko-kitajskikh otnosheniyakh): Sbornik statej. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, s. 370-372.

30. Trush S.M. Rossiya – SShA – Kitaj: rezony i riski rossijsko-kitajskogo voennogo sblizheniya. SShA & Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2020, № 3. Available at: https://usacanada.jes.su/s268667300008591-0-1/ (accessed 17.03.2020).

31. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019. Annual Report to Congress. Department of Defense. May 2019. P.24.

32. Vstrecha s rukovoditelyami mirovykh informagentstv. 24 maya 2014 goda, Sankt-Peterburg. Available at: http://news.kremlin.ru/news/21090 (accessed 12.03.2020).

33. Vstrecha V.V. Putina s chlenami diskussionnogo kluba «Valdaj» 11.09.2006. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/text/appears/2006/09/111114.shtml (accessed 12.03.2020).

34. Vneshnyaya politika i bezopasnost' sovremennoj Rossii. 1991-2002. Khrestomatiya v chetyrekh tomakh. Tom IV. Dokumenty. - M.: ROSSPEhN, 2002. S.519–520.

35. Bzhezinskij Zb. Krizis mirovoj vlasti i trojstvennyj soyuz SShA, Kitaya i Rossii. Rossiya v global'noj politike. 9 yanvarya 2017. Available at: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Krizis-mirovoi-vlasti-i-troistvennyi-soyuz-SShA-Kitaya-i-Rossii-18528 (accessed 12.03.2020).

36. Safranchuk I. Bezradostnyj landshaft. Ehkspertnye mneniya v SShA po rossijsko-amerikanskim otnosheniyam i napravleniya ikh razvitiya. Rossiya v global'noj politike. 2016. № 2. URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/Bezradostnyi-landshaft-18029 (accessed 12.03.2020).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate