Resources and tools of the U.S. science and technology policy in the fight against COVID-19
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Resources and tools of the U.S. science and technology policy in the fight against COVID-19
Annotation
PII
S207054760011701-8-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia Sudakova 
Occupation: Deputy Director
Affiliation: Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Abstract

The U.S. is still leading in confirmed coronavirus cases and deaths. Today it is too early to talk about normalization of the situation. The pandemic has not bypassed any sector of the country 's economy, including the science and technology sector. The paper reveals the major challenges faced by organizations involved in R&D policy in the United States in the new coronavirus epidemic.

In particular, the introduction of the social distancing regime by most states has already led to the closure of many laboratories and scientific research. Scientific organizations have to make difficult choices about which projects are essential or critical enough to continue in the current environment, including in some cases COVID-19-related projects. Even if the scientific project continues, the efficiency and quality of the work carried out can be reduced, relations with suppliers and service providers are disrupted, and some of the resources originally planned for current projects are switched to the fight against the pandemic. Unforeseen expenses arise in connection with the closure or restart of projects, the cancellation of numerous scientific and technical events, conferences, etc.

The article revealed that to date a rather diverse range of anti-pandemic measures have been developed in the United States. Among them are grant funding programs for research related to COVID-19, cooperation in the form of public-private partnership, anti-crisis financial support measures adopted by Congress, etc. The academic research community mobilizes its intellectual resources in the fight against the new coronavirus. The relative autonomy of federal agencies and other organizations of the U.S. science and technology complex in adapting the restrictive measures associated with the pandemic allows for a more flexible response to a rapidly changing situation. Under the D. Trump’s administration, federal spending on science hit a historic high largely due to the efforts of Congress. This may provide a good basis for the rapid redeployment of resources.

It is too early to assess the effectiveness of the measures taken. They are likely to expand over time, taking into account the identified obstacles to rapid inclusion in the fight against the pandemic, creating a margin of safety for the future.

 

Keywords
USA, science and technology policy, coronavirus, COVID-19, response to the pandemic
Received
16.07.2020
Date of publication
25.09.2020
Number of purchasers
25
Views
2498
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S207054760011701-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 20.09.2020
Cite Download pdf

References

1. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE). Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Available at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality (accessed 13.08.2020).

2. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Situation Report – 206. 13 August 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200813-covid-19-sitrep-206.pdf?sfvrsn=bf38f66b_4 (accessed 13.08.2020).

3. Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count. The New York Times. Updated May 28, 2020. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html (accessed 13.08.2020).

4. Morgan D., Sargent Jr. J.F. Effects of COVID-19 on the Federal Research and Development Enterprise. Congressional Research Service. April 10, 2020. Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46309 (accessed 26.04.2020).

5. NASA Response Framework. Available at: https://nasapeople.nasa.gov/coronavirus/nasa_response_framework.pdf (accessed 26.05.2020).

6. Morgan D., Sargent Jr. J.F. Effects of COVID-19 on the Federal Research and Development Enterprise. Congressional Research Service. April 10, 2020. P. 4. Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46309 (accessed 26.04.2020).

7. NIST MEP Centers to Receive CARES Act Funding for Pandemic Response. April 13, 2020. Available at: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2020/04/nist-mep-centers-receive-cares-act-funding-pandemic-response (accessed 26.04.2020).

8. The COVID-19 High Performance Computing Consortium. Available at: https://covid19-hpc-consortium.org/ (accessed 26.04.2020).

9. Standing Committee on Emerging Infectious Diseases and 21st Century Health Threats. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Available at: https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/standing-committee-on-emerging-infectious-diseases-and-21st-century-health-threats (accessed 26.05.2020).

10. FY 2021 R&D Appropriations Dashboard. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Available at: https://www.aaas.org/page/fy-2021-rd-appropriations-dashboard (accessed 26.05.2020)

11. Mobilizing the Academic Research Community in the Fight Against COVID-19. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. April 15, 2020. Available at: https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2020/04/mobilizing-the-academic-research-community-in-the-fight-against-covid-19 (accessed 26.05.2020).

12. COVID-19 Technology Access Framework. Stanford University. Available at: https://otl.stanford.edu/covid-19-technology-access-framework (accessed 26.05.2020).

13. Kommentarij prezidenta RAN Aleksandra Sergeeva po povodu sovmestnogo zayavleniya 15-ti akademij nauk // Novosti sibirskoj nauki. 10.04.2020. Available at: http://www.sib-science.info/ru/ras/kommentariy-sergeeva-09042020 (accessed 26.04.2020).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate