Везде

RAS History & PhilologyAsia and Africa Today

  • ISSN (Print) 0321-5075
  • ISSN (Online)2782-2389

American Greatness: Past or Future? (Platforms of Democratic and Republican parties in 2020)

You can
PII
S207054760011708-5-
DOI
10.18254/S207054760011708-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia Travkina
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 3
Pages
0
Abstract

The electoral platform of the Democratic Party is analyzed, which has received the characteristics of the "most progressive" in the entire American history. Its politicized nature is based on the demonization of the current Republican President Donald Trump. The Democratic program is designed to become a platform for uniting all anti-Trump forces, and as such it contains many deliberately impossible promises and slogans. Significant emphasis in the program is placed on reforming the American political system, which, according to the idea of the political strategists of the Democratic Party, is designed to exclude, in principle, the coming to power of politicians like Donald Trump, who represents the interests of the ruling US financial and economic elite. In the 21st century the American political system of checks and balances has become increasingly unresponsive to the pressing needs of American socio-economic development. Reforms and transformations in the economic and social spheres require a fairly long time horizon for their implementation. As the American political practice of the last 10-12 years shows, the implementation of the declared political course and the implementation of large-scale reforms and transformations are possible only if one of the two main political parties in the United States controls all power over its executive and legislative branches. The loss of control over one of the chambers of Congress simultaneously leads to the blocking of programs of long-term reforms and transformations, which turns into an increase in the intensity of internal political struggle, which most negatively affects the effectiveness of the functioning of state institutions in American society. In these conditions, the need for strengthening authoritarian principles in the US government system is objectively growing, designed to level off the blocking of reforms and transformations initiated by the party that controls the Executive branch of government. In addition, a paradigm is emerging in which a periodic change of the political guard in Washington, embedded in the very idea of a bipartisan liberal democratic system, turns into a sharp increase in destructive principles in the activities of the state, when the political party that came to power as a result of the Presidential election perceives its mandate simply in the form of a program of almost complete dismantling of the legacy left by the previous administration. This political "zero-sum game" leads to quite destructive foreign policy consequences that directly affect the ideological and socio-economic positions of the United States in the international arena.

Keywords
2020 presidential elections, Democratic Party, Republican Party, political platforms, health care reform plans, electoral reform, racial and ethnic minorities, J. Biden-C. Harris, D. Trump-M. Pence, party conventions
Date of publication
25.09.2020
Number of purchasers
25
Views
3626

References

  1. 1. The American Presidency Project. Democratic Party Platforms. 2020 Democratic Party Platform. August 17, 2020. Available at: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/342177
  2. 2. Prokop A. The Democratic platform, explained // Vox, Aug 18, 2020. Available at: https://www.vox.com/2020/8/18/21322685/democratic-convention-platform-controversy
  3. 3. Colburn B. When Poetry Meets Prose--Where Campaigns & Governing Overlap and Collide. － Instutute of Politics. HARVARD Kennedy School. 2020. Available at: https://iop.harvard.edu/get-involved/study-groups/when-poetry-meets-prose-where-campaigns-governing-overlap-and-collide-led
  4. 4. The American Presidency Project. Republican Party Platforms. 2016 Republican Party Platform. July 18, 2016. // https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/318311; The American Presidency Project. Resolution Regarding the Republican Party Platform. August 24, 2020. // https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/resolution-regarding-the-republican-party-platform
  5. 5. The American Presidency Project. Resolution Regarding the Republican Party Platform. August 24, 2020. Available at: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/resolution-regarding-the-republican-party-platform
  6. 6. MacKinnon D. Prepare for four more years of the most disruptive president ever // The Hill, 7/25/20. Available at: https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/508786-prepare-for-four-more-years-of-the-most-disruptive-president-ever
  7. 7. Real Clear Politics. Polls. General Elections: Trump v. Biden. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_biden-6247.html
  8. 8. Skelly J. and Rackish N. No Sitting President Was As Far Behind As Trump Going Into The Conventions // FiveThirtyEight, Aug 24, 2020. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/no-sitting-president-was-as-far-behind-as-trump-going-into-the-conventions/
  9. 9. GULLUP. Jones J. Democratic Edge in Party Affiliation Shrinks. August 24, 2020. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/317771/democratic-edge-party-affiliation-shrinks.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_content=morelink&utm_campaign=syndication
  10. 10. The American Presidency Project. Democratic Party Platforms. 2020 Democratic Party Platform. August 17, 2020. Available at: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/342177
  11. 11. Fowler A. Electoral and Policy Consequences of Voter Turnout: Evidence from Compulsory Voting in Australia // Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2013, No.2, p. 159-182.
  12. 12. Alcorn G. How Australia's compulsory voting saved it from Trumpism // The Guardian, 7 Mar 2019. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/08/how-australias-compulsory-voting-saved-it-from-trumpism
  13. 13. Pew Research Center. Trust and Mistrust in Americans’ Views of Scientific Experts. August 2, 2019. P. 6. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts. pdf
  14. 14. United States Census Bureau. District of Columbia. 2018: ACS 1-Year Estimates. Detailed Tables. Available at: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=0400000US11&tid=ACSDT1Y2018.B03002&hidePreview=true
  15. 15. H.R.51 - Washington, D.C. Admission Act. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/51/all-actions?overview=closed#tabs
  16. 16. United States Census Bureau. QuickFacts. United States. Population Estimates. July 1, 2019. Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219
  17. 17. Duffin E. Percentage distribution of population in the United States in 2016 and 2060, by race and Hispanic origin // Statista, January 28, 2020. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/270272/percentage-of-us-population-by-ethnicities/
  18. 18. Darity W. and Mullen K. Resurrecting the Promise of 40 Acres: the Imperative of Reparations for Black Americans. Report. Roosevelt Institution, June 2020, p. 9. // https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/resurrecting-the-promise-of-40-acres-the-imperative-of-reparations-for-black-americans/
  19. 19. Craemer Th. International Reparations for Slavery and the Slave Trade // Journal of Black Studies, October 2018, pp. 694-713.
  20. 20. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Health Care and the 2020 Presidential Election. August 25, 2020. Slide 4. Available at: https://www.kff.org/slideshow/health-care-and-the-2020-presidential-election/
  21. 21. GALLUP. Most Important Problem. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx
  22. 22. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Health Care and the 2020 Presidential Election. August 25, 2020. Slide 5. Available at: https://www.kff.org/slideshow/health-care-and-the-2020-presidential-election/
  23. 23. Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Primary Care: Estimating Democratic Candidates’ Health Plans. February 26, 2020. Available at: //https://www.crfb.org/papers/primary-care-estimating-democratic-candidates-health-plans
  24. 24. Carney J. and Lillis M. Biden unites Democrats — for now // The Hill, 08/22/20. Available at: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/513174-biden-unites-democrats-for-now
  25. 25. U.S. Department of Education. Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2018. NCES 2019-38. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, February 2019, P.77.
  26. 26. Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis. Economic Research. Student Loans Owned and Securitized, Outstanding. August 27, 2020. Available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SLOAS
  27. 27. Vasil'ev V.S. Mezhdu globalizmom i natsionalizmom: istoricheskij vybor Ameriki (analiz predvybornykh partijnykh programm). // Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke [ehlektronnyj resurs], 2016, № 2. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26626321
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library