Analysis of the results of presidential elections in the US agglomerations in the XXI century
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Analysis of the results of presidential elections in the US agglomerations in the XXI century
Annotation
PII
S207054760015926-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Rachev Pavel 
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Abstract

In the second half of the 20th century, the USA faced the problem of polarizing society. It is expressed, among other things, in political preferences. With the development of transport infrastructure and income increase, Americans began to migrate more often, choosing for residence areas with people with similar politic views. Such migrations form electorally homogeneous regions, which may eventually lead to isolationism and even tribalism. This phenomenon is called “The Big Sort”. The study proposes to identify the dynamics of polarization of the American nation, as well as agglomerations with different electoral preferences using a new quantitative method – Partisan Voting Index.

Keywords
electoral geography, the USA, agglomerations, Partisan Voting Index, presidential elections, polarization, “The Big Sort”
Received
18.05.2021
Date of publication
19.07.2021
Number of purchasers
16
Views
1336
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S207054760015926-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 15.07.2021
Cite Download pdf

References

1. 2010 Standards for delineating metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; Notice // Federal Register, Office of Management and Budget. [Ehlektr. resurs]. URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-06-28/pdf/2010-15605.pdf (data obrascheniya: 01.11.2020); Ratcliffe M. A century of delineating a changing landscape: The Census Bureau’s Urban and Rural Classification, 1910 to 2010. [Ehlektr. resurs]. URL: https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/ua/Century_of_Defining_Urban.pdf (data obrascheniya: 1.11.2020).

2. Bishop B., Cushing R. G. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart // N. Y.: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009.

3. Gosnell H., Gill N. An analysis of the 1932 presidential vote in Chicago // Amer. Political Sci. Rev. Vol. 29. No. 6, 1935. P. 967-984.

4. Wright J. Voting habits in the United States: A note on two maps // Geograph. Rev. Vol. 22. No. 4, 1932. P. 666-672.

5. Rokkan S. Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development, Oslo E New York, Universitetsforlaget E D. Mckay, 1970, 470 p.

6. Khartshorn R. Politicheskaya geografiya. – V sb.: Amerikanskaya geografiya. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. Per.s anglijskogo. Sostaviteli P.Dzhems i K.Dzhons. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya N.N. Baranskogo. M.: Izdatel'stvo Inostrannoj literatury. 1957, 552 s.

7. Archer C., Shelley F. American Electoral Mosaic // Washington D.C.: Resource Publications in Geography, 1996. 96 p.

8. Fiorina M. P., Adams S. A., Pope J. C. Polarization in American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings // The Journal of Politics. Vol. 70, No.2, 2008, P. 556-560.

9. Varyushin P. Territorial'naya ehlektoral'naya struktura SShA: dinamika i faktory formirovaniya / kand. diss., M., 2017.

10. Travkina N. M. Prezidentskaya kampaniya 2016 goda kak otrazhenie ehvolyutsionnykh osobennostej politicheskoj sistemy SShA // Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke [ehlektronnyj zhurnal]. 2016. №1. DOI: 10.18254/S207054760008379-3

11. Frolova O. A. Vliyanie polyarizatsii amerikanskogo obschestva na kharakter i interesy politicheskikh partij v SShA // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Politologiya», 2011, № 4, s. 113–121.

12. Kanevskij P. S. Sotsial'nye razmezhevaniya v amerikanskom soobschestve kak faktor prezidentskoj kampanii 2016 goda // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 18 Sotsiologiya i politologiya, 2017, T. 23, №4, s. 169-181.

13. Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections [Ehlektr. resurs]. URL: https://uselectionatlas.org/ (data obrascheniya: 01.11.2020).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate