Везде
STATE, "THE THIRD SECTOR" AND POPULATION POLICY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
STATE, "THE THIRD SECTOR" AND POPULATION POLICY
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000378-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Mikhail A. Klupt 
ORCID: 0000-0002-9423-4363
Edition
Volume 386 Issue 6
Pages
24-33
Abstract
The paper analyzes relations between the state and NGOs while designing, implementing and modifying the population policy. The cases of France, the U.S., China, Indonesia and Sub-Saharan Africa are compared as reference points to analyze Russia’s population policy. Paradoxically, in the 1990s institutional design of Russia’s population policy held a certain resemblance to the case of Sub-Saharan Africa. Both cases were characterized by passivity of the national governments and activity of foreign and international NGOs. In Russia, such policy was strongly condemned for its inability to raise fertility. Like the pronatalist movement in France and the U.S. international population policy, Russia’s new population policy in 2007 was influenced by not only domestic but also international challenges. Russia’s present-day population policy inherits certain features of the Soviet one, such as fertility growth, being financed predominantly from public funds and controlled by the central government. Since the state has always played the vital role in responses to challenges for Russia, this approach is in good agreement with Russian political tradition. Nevertheless, some important changes should be emphasized. Nowadays the NGOs in Russia are numerous and heterogeneous, the “third sector” is cleaved, the controversies of the population policy, especially on abortion law, remind us of the U.S. “cultural wars” rather than Soviet-time political “monolith”. Generally, the population policy is not a successful incarnation of the global civil society idea. Both in the West and in the rest. Key non-governmental agents in the population arena are affiliated both financially and personally with the government and the ruling elites.
Keywords
state, NGO, population policy, fertility, cross-country comparative analysis
Date of publication
01.06.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
476
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bezrukova O.N. Resursy i seti podderzhki otvetstvennogo roditel'stva v molodyh sem'yah. SPb.: Izd-vo C.-Peterburgskogo un-ta, 2011.


Klupt M.A. Demograficheskaya politika kak predmet kontent-analiza // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2003. № 12. S. 108–117.


Minyust: v 2014 godu v Rossii zaregistrirovano pochti 100% NKO, podavshih zayavleniya. URL: http:// minjust.ru/ru/press/news/minyust-v-2014-godu-v-rossii-zaregistrirovano-pochti-100-nko-podavshihzayavleniya (data obrashcheniya: 16.07.2015).


NKO pokazali vysokuyu fiktivnost'. URL: http://kommersant.ru/doc/2673829 (data obrashcheniya: 21.06.2015).


NKO poluchat iz byudzheta bolee chetyrekh milliardov rublej. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2015/04/02/ nko-site.html (data obrashcheniya: 16.07.2015).


Pensionnyj fond RF: materinskij kapital za vosem' let vyros pochti vdvoe. URL: http://tass.ru/ obschestvo/1614931 (data obrashcheniya: 16.07.2015).


Rybakovskij L.L. Koncepciya demograficheskoj politiki Rossii: opyt razrabotki i puti sovershenstvovaniya // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 9. S. 62–70.


Skol'ko detej hotyat imet' rossiyane // Demoskop Weekly 2002. №81–82. URL: http://demoscope.ru/ weekly/2002/081/tema07.phphttp://demoscope.ru/weekly/2002/081/tema07.php (data obrashcheniya: 16.07.2015).


Shadrin A.E. O realizacii mer po gosudarstvennoj podderzhke social'no orientirovannyh nekommercheskih organizacij. Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii. 2014. URL: http://nko.economy. gov.ru/Files/ NewsDocuments/6e0e82de-9515–4c71-b56c-67c1f86fe863.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 16.07.2015).


Barrett D., Tsui A. Policy as symbolic statement: International response to national population policies// Social Forces. 1999. № 78(1). P. 213–233.


Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia]. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2014.


Chege S. Donors Shift More Aid to NGOs. African Recovery. 1999 (13). URL: http://www.un.org/en/africarenewal/ subjindx/131ngo.htm (data obrashcheniya: 12.07.2015).


Connelly M. Seeing beyond the State. The Population Control Movement and the Problem of Sovereignity // Past and Present: 2006. № 193 (Nov.). P. 197–233.


Ehrlich P. The Population Bomb. NY.: Ballantine Books, 1968.


Greenhalgh S. Science, Modernity and the Making of China’s One-Child Policy // Population and Development Review. 2003. № 29(2). P. 163–196.


Greenhalgh S., Winkler E. Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford. Stanford University Press, 2005.


Hofisi M., Hofisi C. State-NGO Relation in Africa // Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2013. № 4(10). P. 291–298.


Impact of the “Mexico-City Policy” on the free choice of contraception in Europe. Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly. Doc. 9901. Documents, Working Papers. 2003. Vol. 8. P. 77–82.


Landry A. La révolution démographique. Etudes et essais sur les problèmes de population. Paris, 1934.


de Luca V. Des liaisons avantageuses : l’Alliance nationale pour l’accroissement de la population française et les fonctionnaires (1890–1914) // Annales de démographie historique. 2008/2. № 116. P. 255–280.


de Luca V. Restoring the Notion of Family in France. Pronatalist and Pro-family Propaganda in Schools and Army Barracks (1920–1940) // Population. 2005. № 60(1). P. 13–38.


Hofisi M., Hofisi C. State-NGO Relations in Africa Mediterranean // Journal of Social Sciences. 2013. № 4(10). P. 291–298.


Messu M. Les politiques familiales: du natalisme à la solidarité. Paris: Les edition ouvrierè, 1992.


Mosher S. Population Control: Real Costs, Illusory Benefits. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2009.


Natalité en baisse : “Les effets de la mise à mal de notre politique familiale”. URL: http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2015/11/04/01016–20151104ARTFIG00404-natalite-en-baisse-leseffets- de-la-mise-a-mal-de-notre-politique-familiale.php (data obrashcheniya: 22.12.2015).


National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF International. 2014. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF International.


National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (The Kissinger Report). December 10, 1974.


Population Bomb. Hugh Moor Foundation, 1954. Sauvy A. Adolphe Landry // Population. 1956. № 11(4). R. 609–620.


Shiffman J. Political Management in the Indonesian Family Planning Program // International Family Planning Perspectives 2004. № 30(1). R. 27–33.


Soetedjo M., Clinton J. Contraceptive Trends in Indonesia Developing Family Planning Program. 1972– 1973. National Family Planning Coordination Board. Jakarta, 1973.


Sullivan R. The Global, the Local, and Population Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa. URL: http://www.irle. berkeley.edu/culture/papers/sullivan07.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.07.2015).


Thebaud F. Le mouvement nataliste dans la France de l’entre-deux-guerres: l’Alliance nationale pour l’accroissement de la population française//Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 1985. № 32(2). R. 276–346.


Three republicans vote to fund foreign organizations that perform abortions. URL: https://www.lifesitenews. com/news/three-republicans-vote-to-fun-foreign-organizations-that-perform-abortions (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).


U.S. Department of State. Population. URL: http://www.state.gov/j/prm/population/ (data obrashcheniya 11.07.2015.).


Westoff Ch., Bietsch K., Koffman D. Indicators of Trends in Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa // DHS Analytical Studies. № 34. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF International, 2013.


Zansarini-Fournel M. Histoire (s) du MLAC (1973–1975) // Clio. Histoire, femmes et sociétés. 2003. № 18. P. 241–252.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate