Везде
PARENTING VALUES: STRUCTURE, TYPES, RESOURCES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PARENTING VALUES: STRUCTURE, TYPES, RESOURCES
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000380-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga N. Bezrukova 
Edition
Volume 383 Issue 3
Pages
118-127
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study of the attitude of parents to children who are guided by different models of parenthood. The structure of values of children and parenthood is proposed. There are three types of parental attitudes: “children – problems and risks", “children – life purpose", “children – responsibility, duty and public recognition". The article analyzes value differences in parental practices of helping children in difficult life situations. It is shown that the socio-cultural characteristics of parent groups suggest the development of differentiated approaches to support parental potential, contributing to its fuller disclosure, taking into account their needs, opportunities and lack of resources. It is concluded that traditional parents in need of correction authoritarian educational settings, joint – strengthening parental competence, delegating – in the development of parenting skills, ambiguous – the amplification of personal resources, adaptation to life and enhance vitality.
Keywords
parenting; values; children; social resources
Date of publication
01.03.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
497
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Antonov A.I. Sotsiologiya rozhdaemosti. M.: Statistika, 1980.


Ar'es F. Rebenok i semejnaya zhizn' pri starom poryadke. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999.


Bezrukova O.N. Resursy i seti podderzhki otvetstvennogo roditel'stva v molodykh sem'yakh. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2011.


Bezrukova O.N. Modeli roditel'stva i roditel'skij potentsial: mezhpokolennyj analiz // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 9. S. 85–97.


Varlamova S.N., Noskova A.V., Sedova N.N. Sem'ya i deti v zhiznennykh ustanovkakh rossiyan // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2004. № 11. S. 61–73.


Vospriyatie problem detej-sirot i ikh semejnogo ustrojstva v rossijskom obschestve. Tsentr operativnykh i prikladnykh issledovanij Rossijskogo obschestva sotsiologov. RIA Novosti. URL: http://ria.ru/society/20131113/976503088.html#ixzz2kW8ssMJU (data obrascheniya: 7.10.2013).


Gurko T.A. Brak i roditel'stvo v Rossii. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2008.


Gurko T.A. Institut sem'i v postindustrial'nykh obschestvakh // Tsennosti i smysly. 2011. № 4. S. 26–45.


Kartseva L. V. Model' sem'i v usloviyakh transformatsii rossijskogo obschestva // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2003. № 7. S. 92–100.


Kon I.S. Sotsiologicheskaya psikhologiya. Voronezh: MODEhK, 1999.


Lapin N.I. Modernizatsiya bazovykh tsennostej rossiyan // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1996. № 5. S. 3–23.


Medkova D.V. Semejnye tsennosti kak ob'ekt sotsiologicheskogo analiza // Lomonosovskie chteniya. M.: MGU, 2003. T. 2.


Samojlova V.A. Adaptatsiya lichnosti v sovremennom obschestve i problema psikhologicheskogo zdorov'ya detej i podrostkov // Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. 2014. № 167. S. 41–54.


Saralieva Z.Kh., Balabanov S.S. Deti kak zhiznennaya tsennost' rossiyan // Rossiya reformiruyuschayasya. 2009. № 8. S. 390–403.


Kharchev A.G. Brak i sem'ya v SSSR. M.: Mysl', 1979.


Shevchenko P.V. Sotsial'naya rol' moskovskogo volonterstva // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 8. S. 60–71.


Shevchenko I.O., Shevchenko P.V. Bol'shaya sem'ya – kakaya ona? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 1. S. 95–101.


Caldwell J.C. A theory of fertility: from high plateau to destabilization // Population and Development Review. 1978. Vol. 4. P. 553–557.


Flanagan S. Value Change in Industrial Society // American Political Science Review. 1987. Vol. 81. P. 1303–1319.


Inglehart R., Klingemann H.-D., Welzel C. The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis // European Journal of Political Research. 2003. Vol. 42. P. 341–380.


James A., Jenks C., Prout A. Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.


Popenoe D. War over the family. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2005.


Rokeach M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.


Samoylova V., Torronen M., Borodkina O. Family policy in Russia: problems in the establishment process and new shalleges // Empowering Social Work: Research &Practice / Ed. by M. Torronen, O. Borodkina, V. Samoylova, E.


Heino. Palmenia Centre for Continuing Education, University of Helsinki, Kotka Unit Kopijyva Oy, 2013. P. 38–66.


Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1992. Vol. 25. P. 1–65.


Smith K. Producing governable subjects: Images of childhood old and new // Childhood. 2012. 19(1). P. 24–37.


Van de Kaa D. Europe’s Second Demographic Transition // Population Bulletin. 42(1). 1987. R. 1–59.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate