Kirdina S.G. “Grazhdanskoe obschestvo”: ukhod ot ideologemy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 2. C. 63–73.
Kirdina S.G. Sovremennye sotsiologicheskie teorii: aktual'noe protivostoyanie? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. № 8. C. 18–28.
Kozlovskij V.V. Utraty i obreteniya sotsiologii // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 1998. Tom 1. № 1. S. 55–65.
Komu i zachem nuzhna sotsiologiya v Rossii. Interv'yu s Andreem Alekseevym // Troitskij variant. № 16 (185). 11 avgusta 2015 g. URL: http://trv-science.ru/2015/08/11/komu-i-zachem-nuzhnasociologiya- v-rossii/ (data obrascheniya: 10.10.2015).
Mozhe Zh. Sotsiologicheskaya angazhirovannost' // Poehtika i politika. Al'manakh Rossijsko-frantsuzskogo tsentra sotsiologii i filosofii Instituta sotsiologii Rossijskoj Akademii nauk. M.: Institut ehksperimental'noj sotsiologii, SPb.: Aletejya, 1999. S. 292–324.
Myasnikov A.G. Nuzhno li otkazyvat'sya ot grazhdanskogo obschestva? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 2. S. 141–148.
Nesterenko Yu.L. Demagogiya. Klassifikatsiya demagogicheskikh priyomov s primerami i sovetami po protivodejstviyu. 2006-2007. URL: http://fan.lib.ru/n/nesterenko_j_l/text_0610.shtml (data obrascheniya: 12.10. 2015).
Olejnik A.N. Triangulyatsiya v kontent-analize: voprosy metodologii i ehmpiricheskaya proverka // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 2. S. 65–79.
Olejnik A.N., Kirdina S.G., Popova I.P., Shatalova T.Yu. Kak uchenye chitayut drug druga: osnovy teorii akademicheskogo chteniya i ee ehmpiricheskaya proverka // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 8. S. 30–41.
Plakhov V.D. Sotsiologiya kak diskurs / diskursy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 6. S. 60–65.
Podvojskij D.G. Sotsiologiya v sovremennoj Rossii. “Neprichesannye mysli” // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. № 7. S. 47–53.
Sokolov M.M. O protsesse akademicheskoj (de)tsivilizatsii //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 8. S.21–30.
Sokolov M.M. Rossijskaya sotsiologiya posle 1991 goda: intellektual'naya i institutsional'naya dinamika “bednoj nauki” // Laboratorum. 2009a. № 1. S. 20–57.
Sokolov M.M. Rossijskie sotsiologi na mezhdunarodnom i natsional'nom rynke idej (naukometricheskij analiz) //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009b. №1. S.144–152.
Toschenko Zh.T. Novye tendentsii v razvitii rossijskoj sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4. S. 3–12.
Khabermas Yu. Kogda my dolzhny byt' tolerantnymi? O konkurentsii videnij mira, tsennostej i teorij // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2006. № 1. S. 45–53.
Goldgar A. Impolite Learning: Conduct and Community in the Republic of Letters. 1680–1750. Hew Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1995.
Hartley J. Reading and Writing Book Reviews Across Disciplines // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006. Vol. 57. №. 9. P. 1194–1207.
Norris S. P., Philips L.M. The Relevance of a Reader’s Knowledge within a Perspectival View of Reading // Journal of Reading Behavior. 1994. Vol. 26. №. 4. P. 391–412.
Oleinik A. Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: triangulation at work // Quality & Quantity. 2010. Vol. 45. Iss. 4 (June). P. 859–873.
Oleinik O., Popova I., Kirdina S., Shatalova T. On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts // Quality & Quantity. 2014.Volume 48. Issue 5 (2014). P. 2703–2718.
Spektor-Levy O., Eylon B.-S., Schrez Z. Scientific Communication Skills in Science Studies: Does it Make a Difference? // International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2009.Vol. 7. №. 5. R. 875–903.
Comments
No posts found