ON SOME PROBLEMS OF SOCIOLOGICAL DISCOURSE
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ON SOME PROBLEMS OF SOCIOLOGICAL DISCOURSE
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000380-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
148-153
Abstract
The article analyzes the problems of scientific discourse in the Russian sociological community. These include arbitrary interpretation of texts, specific citations, and lack of references to the work of Russian sociologists working in the same field. It is assumed that the main reasons for these problems may be explicit or implicit engagement of researchers, insufficient level of sociological training, and continuing distance from the world of sociology.
Keywords
sociology; scientific discourse; scientific communication; theory of institutional matrices; civil society; civil participation; Russia
Date of publication
01.03.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
481
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Kirdina S.G. “Grazhdanskoe obschestvo”: ukhod ot ideologemy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 2. C. 63–73.

Kirdina S.G. Sovremennye sotsiologicheskie teorii: aktual'noe protivostoyanie? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. № 8. C. 18–28.

Kozlovskij V.V. Utraty i obreteniya sotsiologii // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 1998. Tom 1. № 1. S. 55–65.

Komu i zachem nuzhna sotsiologiya v Rossii. Interv'yu s Andreem Alekseevym // Troitskij variant. № 16 (185). 11 avgusta 2015 g. URL: http://trv-science.ru/2015/08/11/komu-i-zachem-nuzhnasociologiya- v-rossii/ (data obrascheniya: 10.10.2015).

Mozhe Zh. Sotsiologicheskaya angazhirovannost' // Poehtika i politika. Al'manakh Rossijsko-frantsuzskogo tsentra sotsiologii i filosofii Instituta sotsiologii Rossijskoj Akademii nauk. M.: Institut ehksperimental'noj sotsiologii, SPb.: Aletejya, 1999. S. 292–324.

Myasnikov A.G. Nuzhno li otkazyvat'sya ot grazhdanskogo obschestva? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 2. S. 141–148.

Nesterenko Yu.L. Demagogiya. Klassifikatsiya demagogicheskikh priyomov s primerami i sovetami po protivodejstviyu. 2006-2007. URL: http://fan.lib.ru/n/nesterenko_j_l/text_0610.shtml (data obrascheniya: 12.10. 2015).

Olejnik A.N. Triangulyatsiya v kontent-analize: voprosy metodologii i ehmpiricheskaya proverka // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 2. S. 65–79.

Olejnik A.N., Kirdina S.G., Popova I.P., Shatalova T.Yu. Kak uchenye chitayut drug druga: osnovy teorii akademicheskogo chteniya i ee ehmpiricheskaya proverka // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 8. S. 30–41.

Plakhov V.D. Sotsiologiya kak diskurs / diskursy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 6. S. 60–65.

Podvojskij D.G. Sotsiologiya v sovremennoj Rossii. “Neprichesannye mysli” // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. № 7. S. 47–53.

Sokolov M.M. O protsesse akademicheskoj (de)tsivilizatsii //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 8. S.21–30.

Sokolov M.M. Rossijskaya sotsiologiya posle 1991 goda: intellektual'naya i institutsional'naya dinamika “bednoj nauki” // Laboratorum. 2009a. № 1. S. 20–57.

Sokolov M.M. Rossijskie sotsiologi na mezhdunarodnom i natsional'nom rynke idej (naukometricheskij analiz) //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009b. №1. S.144–152.

Toschenko Zh.T. Novye tendentsii v razvitii rossijskoj sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4. S. 3–12.

Khabermas Yu. Kogda my dolzhny byt' tolerantnymi? O konkurentsii videnij mira, tsennostej i teorij // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2006. № 1. S. 45–53.

Goldgar A. Impolite Learning: Conduct and Community in the Republic of Letters. 1680–1750. Hew Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1995.

Hartley J. Reading and Writing Book Reviews Across Disciplines // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006. Vol. 57. №. 9. P. 1194–1207.

Norris S. P., Philips L.M. The Relevance of a Reader’s Knowledge within a Perspectival View of Reading // Journal of Reading Behavior. 1994. Vol. 26. №. 4. P. 391–412.

Oleinik A. Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: triangulation at work // Quality & Quantity. 2010. Vol. 45. Iss. 4 (June). P. 859–873.

Oleinik O., Popova I., Kirdina S., Shatalova T. On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts // Quality & Quantity. 2014.Volume 48. Issue 5 (2014). P. 2703–2718.

Spektor-Levy O., Eylon B.-S., Schrez Z. Scientific Communication Skills in Science Studies: Does it Make a Difference? // International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2009.Vol. 7. №. 5. R. 875–903.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate