Везде
RELIGIOSITY IN FIVE DIMENSIONS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
RELIGIOSITY IN FIVE DIMENSIONS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
G De Jong  D Faulkner
Edition
Issue №12
Pages
69-76
Abstract
This study is based on the concept of CH. Glock, according to which religiosity is manifested in five dimensions: ideological, ritualistic, experienced, intellectual and resultant (for the previous four (approx. translator)). In the course of study1, data on 362 students were analyzed for scalability. Five Guttmann – type scales are constructed, one for each dimension. Relationships between measurements were checked by calculating correlation coefficients. The most important was the ideological dimension. The weakest correlations were given by the resulting measurement, which presumably reflects the qualitative difference between this measurement as a way of determining religiosity. Differences in the strength of the connection are empirical evidence that religious engagement is characterized by multiple dimensions, and some of them are more closely related than others.
Keywords
-
Date of publication
01.12.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
467
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Dzhejms U. Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyta. M.: Nauka, 1993.
 Dyurkgejm Eh. Ehlementarnye formy religioznoj zhizni. Totemicheskaya sistema v Avstralii // “Sotsiologiya religii. Referativnyj zhurnal”. 1991. № 4 (INION RAN).
 Tajlor Eh. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury, 1989.
 Frehzer D. Zolotaya vetv'. M.: Ehksmo, 2006.
 Allport G. et al. The Religion of the Post-War College Student//The Journal of Psychology. 1948. № 25.
 Fukuyama Y. The Major Dimensions of Church Membership//Review of Religious Research. 1961.
 Glock C. On the Study of Religious Commitment//Religious Education, Research Supplement. 1962. № 42.
 Lenski G. The Religious Factor. New York, 1961.
 Marett R. The Threshold of Religion. London, 1909.
 Menzel H. A New Coefficient for Scalogram analysis // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1963. № 17.
 Nottingham E. Religion and Society. New York, 1954.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate