Везде

RAS History & PhilologyAsia and Africa Today

  • ISSN (Print) 0321-5075
  • ISSN (Online)2782-2389

The Non-Obvious Solidarity: the Problem of Empirical Study of Hardly Verified Social States

You can
PII
S013216250002154-2-1
DOI
10.31857/S013216250002154-2
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg Karmadonov
Galina Kovrigina
  • Occupation: Assoc. Prof., the Institute of Economics, Management and Law of the Irkutsk National Research Technical University
  • Affiliation: Irkutsk National Research Technical University
  • Address: Russian Federation
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue10
Pages
14-23
Abstract

The principal objects of sociological science in the most general form can be classified into the obvious/easily verifiable, and the unobvious/difficultly verifiable ones. Social solidarity is in the second row. Being one of the basic research phenomena of sociology, solidarity, at the same time, is one of the most complex objects for empirical study. Purely sociological description and analysis of this phenomenon suffer from well-known empirical one-sidedness and methodological undevelopment, because solidarity, which is a complex phenomenon, can be most adequately described in the same – complex approach synthesizing descriptive matrices of sociology, psychology and sociobiology.

Keywords
social solidarity, non-obviousness, verifiability, methodology of empirical search, polydisciplinarity
Date of publication
29.11.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
689

References

  1. 1. Aleksandrova Yu. A. Obschestvenno-politicheskie otnosheniya v sovremennoj Rossii: k voprosu ob otsenke stepeni konsolidatsii i dezintegratsii // Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. 2017. T. 17. № 2. S. 11–16.
  2. 2. Aristotel'. Sochineniya: V 4-kh t. T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1983.
  3. 3. Bergson A. Dva istochnika morali i religii. M.: Kanon, 1994.
  4. 4. Gofman A. B. Solidarnost' ili pravila, Dyurkgejm ili Khajek? O dvukh formakh sotsial'noj integratsii // Sotsiologicheskij ezhegodnik – 2012. Sb. nauch. tr. / Red. N. E. Pokrovskij, D. V. Efremenko. M.: INION RAN, 2013. S. 97–167.
  5. 5. Eremicheva G. V. Sotsial'noe neravenstvo – negativnyj faktor v protsesse konsolidatsii // Usloviya i vozmozhnosti konsolidatsii rossijskogo obschestva. Sb. nauch. tr. SI RAN / Otv. red. A. V. Duka, I. I. Eliseeva. SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2010. S. 219–249.
  6. 6. Efremenko D. V., Evseeva Ya. V., Simonova O. A. Solidarnost' i al'truizm kak faktory sotsial'nogo splocheniya (vstupitel'naya stat'ya) // Sotsial'naya solidarnost' i al'truizm: Sotsiologicheskaya traditsiya i sovremennye mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya. Sb. nauch. tr. Ser. «Teoriya i istoriya sotsiologii». Tsentr sots. nauch.-inf. issled. Otd. sotsiologii i sots. psikhologii / Otv. red. D. V. Efremenko. M.: INION, 2014. S. 5–15.
  7. 7. Kalashnikov K. N., Sharov V. V. Trudovye otnosheniya v Rossii: mezhdu partnerstvom i konfrontatsiej // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 4. C. 73–81.
  8. 8. Karelina M. V. Regional'nye profsoyuzy v sotsial'nom dialoge // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 3. S. 62–70.
  9. 9. Karmadonov O. A., Zverev M. K. Konsolidatsiya rossijskogo obschestva: potoki i pregrady. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGU, 2012.
  10. 10. Karmadonov O. A. Solidarnost', integratsiya, kon'yunktsiya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 2. S. 3–12.
  11. 11. Karmadonov O. A., Kovrigina G. D. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie faktory makro- i mikrosotsial'noj konsolidatsii v molodezhnoj srede // Nauchnyj rezul'tat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie. 2017. T. 3. № 2. S. 32–47.
  12. 12. Karmadonov O. A. Normy i ehmpatiya kak faktory sotsial'nykh preobrazovanij // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 4. S. 1–11.
  13. 13. Kont O. Dukh pozitivnoj filosofii (Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii). SPb., 1910. URL: http://www.100bestbooks.ru/files/Kont_Duh_pozitivnoy_filosofii.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.05.2018).
  14. 14. Kosharnaya G. B. Institutsional'noe i mezhlichnostnoe doverie v konsolidatsii rossijskogo obschestva // Vlast'. 2015. № 9. S. 125–129.
  15. 15. Lokosov V. V. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie faktory konsolidatsii rossijskogo obschestva: regional'nyj aspekt // Ehkonomika regiona. 2014. № 3. S. 74—82.
  16. 16. Maksimova S. G., Morkovkina A. G. Obraz Rossii v predstavleniyakh naseleniya sovremennykh prigranichnykh regionov // Siberian Socium. 2017. T. 1. № 1. S. 76–83.
  17. 17. Molodov O. B. Sotsial'naya konsolidatsiya v usloviyakh novoj real'nosti: problema obschestvennoj aktivnosti i identichnosti naseleniya regiona // Problemy razvitiya territorii. 2016. Vyp. 2 (82). S. 82–97.
  18. 18. Moskvin L. B. Doverie kak vazhnejshaya predposylka soglasiya v obschestve // Soglasie v obschestve kak uslovie razvitiya sovremennoj Rossii (politicheskie i sotsial'nye aspekty). M.: IS RAN, 2011. S. 67–78.
  19. 19. Platon. Alkiviad I // Platon. Sobr. sochinenij v 4 t.: T. I. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 220–267.
  20. 20. Platon. Gosudarstvo. Kniga II // PSYLIB. Samopoznanie i samorazvitie. Psikhologicheskaya biblioteka Kievskogo Fonda sodejstviya razvitiyu psikhicheskoj kul'tury. URL: http://psylib.org.ua/books/plato01/26gos02.htm (data obrascheniya: 20.05.2018).
  21. 21. Polyushkevich O. A. Sotsial'naya ehmpatiya: voprosy konsolidatsii rossijskogo obschestva // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2015. № 6 (130). S. 3–18.
  22. 22. Ridli M. Proiskhozhdenie al'truizma i dobrodeteli: ot instinktov k sotrudnichestvu. M.: Ehksmo, 2014.
  23. 23. Rusinova N. L., Panova L. V. Sotsial'nye neravenstva i ogranichennost' resursov sotsial'nogo kapitala kak prepyatstviya konsolidatsii rossijskogo obschestva // Usloviya i vozmozhnosti konsolidatsii rossijskogo obschestva. Sb. nauch. tr. SI RAN / Otv. red. A. V. Duka, I. I. Eliseeva. SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2010. S. 164–218.
  24. 24. Trofimova I. N. Struktura i dinamika institutsional'nogo doveriya v sovremennom rossijskom obschestve // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 5. C. 68–75.
  25. 25. Khalij I. A., Aksenova O. V. Aktivnost' struktur grazhdanskogo obschestva: orientatsiya na vzaimodejstvie sotsial'nykh sub'ektov // Sotsial'nye faktory konsolidatsii rossijskogo obschestva: sotsiologicheskoe izmerenie. M.: Novyj khronograf, 2010. S. 222–249.
  26. 26. Tsitseron. O starosti. O druzhbe. Ob obyazannostyakh. M.: Nauka, 1993.
  27. 27. Tsitseron. Dialogi: O gosudarstve. O zakonakh. M.: Ladomir, Nauka, 1994.
  28. 28. Yadov V. A. Solidarnosti rossiyan v povsednevnoj zhizni i v obschegosudarstvennom masshtabe // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2002. № 12. S. 90–94.
  29. 29. Yanitskij O. N. Mobilizatsionnaya struktura grazhdanskogo obschestva // Ofitsial'nyj sajt IC RAN. 2010. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=1924 (data obrascheniya: 16.05.2018).
  30. 30. Yanitskij O. N. Risk-solidarnosti: rossijskaya versiya // INTER. 2004. № 2–3. S. 52–62.
  31. 31. Bowles S. Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? // Science. 2009. V. 324. R. 1293–1298.
  32. 32. Boyd R., Richerson P. Culture and Cooperation // Beyond Self-Interest / Ed. J. J. Mansbridge. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990. P. 111–132.
  33. 33. Choi J. K., Bowles S. The coevolution of parochial altruism and war // Science. 2007. Vol. 318. P. 636–640.
  34. 34. Comte A. System of Positive Polity. Vol. 2. // Social Statics, Or The Abstract Theory of Human Order. London: Longmans, Green, and Co. 1875. URL: https://archive.org/details/systemofpositive02comt (data obrascheniya: 16.05.2018).
  35. 35. Efremenko D., Evseeva Y. Studies of Social Solidarity in Russia: Tradition and Modern Trends // American Sociologist. 2012. No. 43. P. 349–365.
  36. 36. Hauert C., Traulsen A., Brandt H., Nowak M. A., Sigmund K. Via freedom to coercion: the emergence of costly punishment // Science. 2007. Vol. 316. P. 1905–1907.
  37. 37. Hill S. Europe’s Promise: Why the European Way is the Best Hope in an Insecure Age. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2010.
  38. 38. Jaeggy A. V., Stevens J. M.G., Van Schaik C. P. Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees // American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2010. Vol. 143 (1). P. 41–51.
  39. 39. Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives / Ed. by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, B. Buunk, S. Lindenberg. New York: Springer, 2006.
  40. 40. Trivers R. L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism // Quarterly Review of Biology. 1971. Vol. 46. P. 35–57.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library