Везде
«Post-truth» in Social Reality: Risks and Threats
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
«Post-truth» in Social Reality: Risks and Threats
Annotation
PII
S013216250003173-3-1
DOI
10.31857/S013216250003173-3
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
I. Shushpanova 
Occupation: Senior Researcher of the Center for Strategic social and socio-political research, Institute of Social and Political Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of Social and Political Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 12
Pages
94-104
Abstract

In the current post-truth culture, the problem of reliable reflection of socio-political reality in the public consciousness is topical. Widespread dissemination of false, fake news is a threat to society and democracy. The term «post-truth» is ambiguously defined in scientific, journalistic circles, among politicians and public figures. The post-truth politics is reflected in the international arena, in conflicts between countries, as well as at the regional level in the battle for the votes. The post-truth culture spreads widely on the Internet, creating a non-alternative personalized «world of truth» for the user. Fake news is gradually becoming a source of concern for the authorities of many states, threatening their internal security and destabilizing international democratic order. Average citizen might hardly tell false information from truth. Information can undermine public trust of citizens and cause widespread protest activity against authorities and democratic values, discrediting both professional journalists, politicians, and the power structures. The fight against false sources of information in the electronic and digital field is gaining momentum. In order to prevent the spread of the post-truth culture, a number of countries have chosen a strategy for strengthening censorship and introducing control over information posted in various media. This way can lead to infringement on civic rights and freedoms, threat to democracy and emergence of authoritarian regimes. Another strategy is to consolidate efforts of civil society, state, means and sources of information dissemination and companies engaged in digital technologies. This – in sum – contributes to the fight against the post-truth culture.

Keywords
«post-truth», democracy, social networks, communication, public opinion, elections, information and communication technologies, reliable information, fake, false information
Received
28.12.2018
Date of publication
09.01.2019
Number of purchasers
10
Views
767
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Andrianov I.V., Levashov V.K., Khlopyev A.T. (1993) «Rumors» as a Social Phenomenon. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No.1: 82–88. (In Russ.)

2. Aristotle (2017) The Politics. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)

3. Koretskaya O.V. (2017) «Post-truth» Concept as a Linguistic Phenomenon of the Modern English Media-discourse. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice]. No. 7–3(73): 136–138. (In Russ.)

4. Levashov V.K., Afanasev V.A., Novozhenina O.P., Shushpanova I.S. (2017) Crisis and Risks of Sustainable Development of Russian Society. According to the Materials of XLV Stage of Sociological Monitoring «How Are You, Russia?», December 2016. Moscow: ISPI RAN. (In Russ.)

5. Allport G. (2002) Becoming Personality. Selected Works. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.)

6. Alterman E. (2004) When Presidents Lie: a History of Official Deception and Its Consequence. New York: Viking Penguin.

7. Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru%B9/posttruth (accessed 24.04.2018).

8. D’Ancona M. (2017) Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.

9. Davis E. (2017) Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It. London: Little, Brown.

10. Keyes R. (2004) The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

11. Lippmann W. (1922) Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.

12. McIntyre L. (2018) Post-truth. London: MIT Press.

13. Oxford Dictionaries. URL:https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/post-truth (accessed 07.04.2018).

14. Roberts D. (2010) Post-truth Politics. Grist. April, 1. URL: https://grist.org/article/2010-03-30-post-truthpolitics/ (accessed 15.04.2018).

15. Tesich S. (1992) The Watergate Syndrome: A Government Of Lies. The Nation. January, 6/13: 12–14.

16. Diccionario de la Real Academia Española. URL: http://dle.rae.es/?id=TqpLe0m (accessed 26.04.2018). (In Span.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate