Везде
МИННЕСОТО-ТЕХАССКИЙ ПРОЕКТ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ УСЫНОВЛЕНИЯ: АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЙ ОБЗОР
Оглавление
Аннотация Оценить Содержание публикации
Библиография Комментарии
Поделиться
QR
Метрика
МИННЕСОТО-ТЕХАССКИЙ ПРОЕКТ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ УСЫНОВЛЕНИЯ: АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЙ ОБЗОР
Аннотация
Код статьи
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
Д. И. Осина   РЕКУНЧАК МАКСИМ ПЕТРОВИЧ
Аннотация
Анализируется Миннесото-Техасский проект исследований усыновления: его история в контексте становления практик замещающей заботы в США; исследовательский дизайн; основные результаты, сформулированные для приёмных детей и подростков, кровных матерей и приёмных родителей, а также применительно к отношениям внутри сетей приёмного родства. Основные понятия проекта обсуждены и соотнесены с отечественной терминологией.
Ключевые слова
практики замещающей заботы, конфиденциальность/открытость приёма (усыновления), сеть приёмного родства, приёмные родители, кровные родители, приёмная идентичность.
Классификатор
Дата публикации
01.05.2013
Всего подписок
1
Всего просмотров
630
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Цитировать   Скачать pdf

Библиография



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

    

  1. Барский Ф.И. Наследственные и средовые факторы в восприятии семьи подростками: Дисс.. канд. психол.н. М., 2010.
    2. 

  2. Барский Ф.И., Грицук А.Г. "Интервью о жизненной истории" Д. Макадамса как метод исследования нарративной идентичности // Психологическая диагностика. 2008. № 5. С. 3-48.
    3. 

  3. Макадамс Д.П. Психология жизненных историй // Методология и история психологии. 2008. Т. 3. Вып. 3. С. 135-166.
    4. 

  4. Ослон В.Н. Жизнеустройство детей-сирот: профессиональная замещающая семья. М.: Генезис, 2006.
    5. 

  5. Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время / Пер. с нем. В.В. Би-бихина. СПб.: Наука, 2006.
    6. 

  6. Эриксон Э. Идентичность: юность и кризис: пер. с англ. / Под ред. А.В. Толстых. М.: Флинта, МПСИ: Прогресс, 2006.
    7. 

  7. Ямпольский М. Демон и Лабиринт. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 1996.
    8. 

  8. Adopting in Massachusetts. (2000). Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts, 2000.
    9. 

  9. Aquilino W.S. From adolescent to young adult: A prospective study of parent-child relations during the transition to adulthood // Journal of Marriage & the Family. 1997. № 59 (3). P. 670-686.
    10. 

  10. Aquilino W.S. Family relationships and support systems in emerging adulthood. // Arnett J.J. Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century / Ed. by J.L. Tanner. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006. P. 193-217.
    11. 

  11. Arnett J.J. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development form the late teens through the twenties // American Psychologist. 2000. № 55 (5). P. 469-480.
    12. 

  12. Arnett J.J. Emerging adulthood: Understanding the new way of coming of age. // Arnett J.J. Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century / Ed. by J.L. Tanner. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006. P. 3-19.
    13. 

  13. Baden A.L., Wiley M.O. Counseling Adopted Persons in Adulthood: Integrating Practice and Research // The Counseling Psychologist. 2007. № 35. P. 868-901.
    14. 

  14. Baran A., Pannor R. Open adoption. // Brodzinsky D. The psychology of adoption / Ed. by M. Schechter. NY: Oxford University Press, 1990. P. 316-331.
    15. 

  15. Berge J.M., Mendenhall T.J., Wrobel G.M. et al. Adolescents' feelings about openness in adoption: Implications for adoption agencies // Child Welfare. 2006. № 85. P. 1011-1039.
    16. 

  16. Boss P.G. Family stress management. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications, 1988.
    17. 

  17. Brodzinsky D.M. Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children // Adoption Quarterly. 2006. № 9. P. 1-18.
    18. 

  18. Brodzinsky D.M., Singer L.M., Braff A.M. Children's understanding of adoption // Child development. 1984. № 55. P. 869-878.
    19. 

  19. Christian C.L., McRoy R.G., Grotevant H.D., Bryant C. Grief resolution of birthmothers in confidential, time-limited mediated, ongoing mediated, and fully disclosed adoptions // Adoption Quarterly. 1997. № 1 (2). Р. 35-58.
    20. 



 


    

  1. Curtis P. The dialectics of open versus closed adoption of infants // Child Welfare. 1986. № 65. Р. 437445.
    2. 

  2. Dunbar N. Typologies of adolescent adoptive identity: The influence of family context and relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota, 2003.
    3. 

  3. Dunbar N., Grotevant H.D. Adoption narratives: The construction of adoptive identity during adolescence // M.W. Pratt Family stories and the life course: Across time and generations. / Ed. by B.H. Fiese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2004. P. 135-161.
    4. 

  4. Dunbar N.D., van Dulmen M.H.M., Ayers-Lopez S. et al. Openness Changes in Adoptive Kinship Network Connections // Dunbar N.D., Kholer J.K., M.H.M. van Dulmen (Chairs). An integrative approach to understanding development and maintenance of relationships within the adoptive kinship network. The annual meetings of the National Council on Family Relations. Minneapolis, 2000
    5. 

  5. Fravel D.L. Boundary ambiguity perceptions of adoptive parents experiencing various levels of openness in adoption. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota, 1995.
    6. 

  6. Fravel D.L., Grotevant H.D., Boss P.G., McRoy R.G. Boundary ambiguity across levels of openness in adoption // Proceedings of the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop of the National Council on Family Relations / Ed. by M. Crosbie- Burnett. New Orleans, LA, 1993.
    7. 

  7. FravelD.L., McRoy R.G., Grotevant H.D. Birthmother perceptions of the psychologically present adopted child: Adoption openness and boundary ambiguity // Family Relations. 2000. № 49. P. 425-433.
    8. 

  8. Grotevant G.D., McRoy R.G. The Minnesota/Texas Adoption Research Project: Implications of Opennes in Adoption for Development and Relationships // Applied Developmental Science. 1997. № 1(4). Р. 168-186.
    9. 

  9. Grotevant H.D. The integrative nature of identity: Bringing the soloists to sing in the choir // Discussions on ego identity / Ed. by J. Kroger. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993. Р. 121-146.
    10. 

  10. Grotevant H.D. Coming to terms with adoption: The construction of identity from adolescence into adulthood // Adoption Quarterly. 1997. № 1 (1). Р. 3-27.
    11. 

  11. Grotevant H.D. Counseling Psychology Meets the Complex World of Adoption // The Counseling Psychologist. 2003. № 31 (6). Р. 753-762.
    12. 

  12. Grotevant H.D. Openness in adoption: re-thinking "family" in the US // Reproductive disruptions: gender, technology, and biopolitics in the new millennium / Ed. by C. Marcia Inhorn. NY: Berghahn books, 2007. P. 122-144.
    13. 

  13. Grotevant H.D., McRoy R.G. Openness in Adoption: Exploring Family Connections. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage, 1998.
    14. 

  14. Grotevant H.D., Dunbar N., Kohler J.K., Esau A.L. Adoptive identity: How contexts within and beyond the family shape developmental pathways // Family Relations. 2000. № 49. Р. 379-387.
    15. 

  15. Grotevant H.D., McRoy R.G., van Dulmen M.H.M. The adoptive kinship network: Putting the perspectives together. Openness in adoption: Exploring family connection. / Ed. by H.D. Grotevant, R.G. McRoy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
    16. 

  16. Grotevant H.D., McRoy R.G., Elde C., Fravel D.L. Adoptive family system dynamics: Variations by level of openness in the adoption // Family Process. 1994. № 33. Р. 125-146
    17. 

  17. Grotevant H.D., Ross N.M., Marchel M.A., McRoy R.G. Adaptive behavior in adopted children: Predictors from early risk, balance of relationships in the adoptive kinship network, and openness arrangements // Journal of Adolescent Research. 1999. № 14. P. 231-247.
    18. 

  18. Grotevant H.D., Rueter M., Von Korff L., Gonzalez C. Post-adoption contact, adoption communicative openness, and satisfaction with contact as predictors of externalizing behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2011. № 5 (52). Р. 529-536.
    19. 

  19. Grotevant H.D., Wrobel G.M., van Dulmen M.H., McRoy R.G. The emergence of psychosocial engagement in adopted adolescents: The family as context over time // Journal of Adolescent Research. 2001. № 16. Р. 469-490.
    20. 

  20. Henney S., Ayers-Lopez S., McRoy R.G., Grote-vant H.D. A longitudinal perspective on changes in adoption openness: The birthmother story. // Contact in adoption and permanent foster care: Research, theory, and practice / Ed. by B. Neil, D. Howe. London: BAAF, 2004.
    21. 

  21. Kegan R. The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1982.
    22. 

  22. Klinger E. The search for meaning in evolutionary perspective and its clinical implications // The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications / Ed. by Wong P. T. P., Fry P. S. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998. P. 27-50.
    23. 

  23. Kohler J.K., Grotevant H.D., McRoy R.G. Adopted adolescents' preoccupation with adoption: Impact of adoptive family dynamics // Journal of Marriage and the Family. 2002. № 64. P. 93-104.
    24. 

  24. Lapsley D.K., & Edgerton, J. Separation-indivi-duation, adult attachment style, and college adjustment // Journal of Counseling & Development. 2002. № 80 (4). P. 484-492.
    25. 

  25. McAdams D.P. A life-story model of identity // Perspectives in personality / Ed. by Jones H., Jones W.H. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987. Р. 15-50.
    26. 

  26. McRoy R.G. Openness in Infant and Older Child Adoptions: Translating Research Findings into Practice. Presentation on the New Worlds of Adoption: Linking Research with Practice Conference, April 7, 2010. Boston: Boston College Graduate School of Social Work, 2010.
    27. 

  27. McRoy R.G., Ayers-Lopez S., Henney S.M., Christian C., & Gossman G. Adoption openness: Longitudinal Birth Mother Outcomes. Final Report for Office of Population Affairs, US Department of Health and Human Services. Austin, TX: University of Texas Center for Social Work Research, 2001.
    28. 

  28. McRoy R.G., Grotevant H.D. & White K.L. Openness in adoption: New practices, new issues. NY: Praeger, 1988.
    29. 

  29. Mendenhall T.J., Berge J.M., Wrobel G.M., Grote-vant H.D., McRoy R.G. Adolescents' satisfaction with contact in adoption // Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2004. № 21. P. 175-190.
    30. 

  30. Mishler E.G. Storyline: Craftartists' Narratives of Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. 1999.
    31. 

  31. Musante D.S. Family predictors of negative instability in adopted emerging adults. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 2010. V. I. P.81.
    32. 

  32. Neil B., Howe D. (eds) Contact in adoption and permanent foster care: Research, theory, and practice. London: BAAF, 2004.
    33. 



 


    

  1. Reitz M., Watson K.W. Adoption and the family system: Strategies for treatment. NY: Guilford, 1992.
    2. 

  2. Ross N.M. Adoptive family processes that predict adopted child behavior and self-esteem. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Minnesota, 1995.
    3. 

  3. Schmid K. Intergenerational relationships in adoptive families: Adoptive parents' interpretations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota, 1994.
    4. 

  4. Silber K., Doner P.M. Children of open adoptions. San Antonio, TX: Corona, 1990.
    5. 

  5. Von Korff L. Openness arrangements and psychological adjustment in adolescent adoptees. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Minnesota, 2004.
    6. 

  6. Wrobel G., Ayers-Lopez S., Grotevant H.D., Mc Roy R.G.,Friedrick M. Openness in adoption and the level of child participation // Child Development. 1996. № 67. P. 2358-2374.
    7. 

  7. Wrobel G.M., Grotevant H.D., McRoy R.G. Adolescent search for birthparents: Who moves forward // Journal of Adolescent Research. 2004. № 19. Р. 132151.
    8. 

  8. Wrobel G.M., Kohler J.K., Grotevant H.D., McRoy R.G. Factors related to patterns of information exchange between adoptive parents and children in mediated adoptions // Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 1998. № 19. Р. 641-657.
    9. 

  9. Wrobel G.M., Kohler J.K., Grotevant H.D., McRoy R.G. The family adoption communication model (FAC): Identifying pathways of adoption-related communication // Proceedings of the 29th Annual Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop of the National Council on Family Relations / Ed by M. Johnson LA, CA: NCFR, 1999.
    10. 

  10. Wrobel G.M., Grotevant, H.D., Berge, J., Menden-hall T.J., McRoy R.G. Contact in adoption: The experience of adoptive families in the USA // Adoption and Fostering. 2003. № 27(1). Р. 57-67.
    11. 

  11. Zamosthy K.P., O'Brien K.M., Baden A.L., Wiley M.O. The Practice of Adoption // The Counseling Psychologist. 2003. № 31. Р. 651-678.
    12.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести