References

Additional sources and materials

1. Berlyne D. E. Aesthetics and psychobiology. N. Y., 1971.2. Burt C. How the mind works. L., 1933.3. Child I. Z. Bases of transcullural agreement in response to art//Ed. H. L. Day. Advances in intrinsic motivation and aesthctics/N. Y.: Plenum press, 1981.-4. Child I. Z-, Iwao S. Young children’s preferential responses to visual art//Scientinc Aeslhcdcs/Sciences de Part. 1977. V. 1. №. 4.5. Child I. E, Iwao S. Responses of children to art. Final Report. Project No. 0-0079, U. S. Department of Helth, Education and Welfare Office of Education, Bureau of Research. 1979.6. Child I. L. Aesthetic judgment in childrcnZ/Trans-action, 1970. V. 7. № 7.7. Child I. L The problem of objectivity in esthetic value//Penn State Papers in Art Education. 1967. № I-8. Eysenck If. J., Iwawaki S. The determination of aesthetic judgment by race and sex//J. Soc. Psychol. 1975. V. 96.9. Torshilova E. M. Mozhno li poverit' algebroj garmoniyu (Kriticheskij ocherk ehksperimental'noj ehstetiki.) M.: Iskusstvo, 1988.10. Torshilova E. M. Ehmotsional'nyj komponent ehsteticheskogo vospriyatiya v ehksperimental'nom issledovanii//Iskusstvo i ehmotsii. Perm', 1991.