References

Additional sources and materials

1. Zabrodin Yu. M. Osnovy psikhofizicheskoj teorii sensornykh protsessov (teoreticheskaya i ehksperimental'naya psikhofizika). Diss. na soiskanie uch. st. d. p. n. L.,1977.2. Zabrodin Yu. M., Nosulenko V. N., Pakhomov A. P. Dinamicheskie aspekty protsessa obnaruzheniya.— V kn.: Psikhofizika sensornykh sistem. M., 1979, s. 9—45.3. Ivanitskij A. M., Korsakov I. A., Matveeva L. V. Dinamika medlennoj ehlektricheskoj aktivnosti kory bol'shikh polusharij cheloveka i oshibki vospriyatiya.— Zh.vyssh. nervn. deyat., t. 30, v'p. 3, s. 602—605.4. Stivens S. S. Matematika, izmenenie, psikhofizika.— V kn.: Ehksperimental'naya psikhologiya/Pod red. S. S. Stivensa. T. I. M.. 1960, s. 56—82.5. Frishman E. 3. Individual'nye osobennosti dinamiki pokazatelej obnaruzheniya. Diss. na soiskanie uch. st. k. p. n. M., 1977.6. Frishman E. 3. Variativnost' porogov obnaruzheniya i ee prichiny.— V kn.: Psikhofizika sensornykh sistem. M., 1979, s. 34—51.7. Bakan R. Extraversion-inlroversion and improvement in an auditory vigilance task.—Brit. J. Psychol., 1959, v. 50, p. 325—332.8. Broadbent D. E. Decision and stress. London — N. Y., 1971.S. Broadbent D. E., Gregory H. Vigilance considerated as a statistical decision.— Brit.J. Psychol., 1963, V. 54, p. 309—325.10. Broadbent D. E., Gregory M. Devision of attention and the decision theory of signal detection.—Proc. Roy. Soc., 1963, v. 158, Ser. B. p. 222—231.11. Corcoran D. W. J. Personality and the invertea-t/-relation.— Brit. J. Psvchol., 1965,V. 56, p. 267—273.12. Crider A., Augenbraun C. B. Auditory vigilance correlates of electrodermal response habituation speed.—Psychophysiol., 1975, v. 12, p. 36—40.13. Davies D. R., Hockey G. R. J., Taylor A. Varied auditory stimulation, temperament differences and vigilance performance.— Brit. J. Psvchol., 1969, v. 60, p. 453—457.14. Eysenck H. I. The biological basis of personality. Illinois, 1967.15. Green D., Swefs J. Signal detection and psychophysics. N. Y., 1966.16. Gruzelier I. H., Corbalis M. C. Effect of instructions and drug administration on temporal resolution of pourflashes.— The Quart. .1. Expt! Psychol., 1970, v. 22, p. 115—124.17. Gruzelier J. H., Venables P. IT. Two-flash threshold, sensitivity and |5 in normal subject and schizophrenics.- Quart. J. Exptl Psychol., 1974, v. 26, p. 594—604.18. lerison H. J., Picket R. M., Stenson IT. IT. The elicited observing rale and decision processes in vigilance.— Human Factor, 1965, v. 7, p. 107—128.19. Kopp J., Livermorf I. Differential discriminability or response bias? A signal detection analysis of categorical perception.— J. Exptl Psychol., 1973, v. 101, p. 179—182.20. Mackworth J. F., Taylor M. Ya. The rf'-measure of signal detectability during vigilancelike situation.—Canad. J. Psychol., 1963, v. 17, p. 302—325.21. Miloshevic S. Changes in detection measures and skin resistance during an auditory vigilance task.— Ergonomics,, 1975, v. 18, p. 1—18.22. Miloshevic S. Vigilance Performance ana the Amplitude of EEG Activity.— Ergonimics, 1978. v. 21, N 11, p. 887—894.23. Reed G. F., Francis T. R. Drive, personality and audiometric response consistency.—Perceptual and motor Skills, 1962, v. 15, p. 681—682.24. Stephens S. D. G. Auditory threshold variance, signal detection theory and personality.— Intern. Audiology. 1969, v. 8, p. 131—137.25. Siroh C. Vigilance: the problem of sustained attention. Oxford, 1971,26. Tanner W., Swets J. A decision-making theory of visual detection.— Psychol. Rev.,1954. V. 61, p. 401—409.27. Welford A. T. Stress and performance.-Ergonomics, 1973, v. 16, p. 567—580.