Везде
MODERN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MODERN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Annotation
PII
S0205-96060000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergey Semenov 
Edition
Volume 36 Issue 2
Pages
278-288
Abstract
Rapid progress of science and technology has characterized the period since the mid-19th century. This article provides a retrospective historical analysis of the chief factors that influenced the development of complex technological systems and the phases and duration of their life cycles. In the course of technological progress, the time lag between the first conception of a complex technological system and its full development and practical application has been constantly shrinking, from about a 100 to approximately 5 years. Lifetimes of the subsequent generations of a particular technological system, from the first model to the point when it becomes completely obsolete, have also been reduced to between 2 and 10 years, depending of the type of technology. In order to ensure the competitiveness of a product, one has to determine correctly the moment of transition from an old technological system to a new one. The methods of such technological change are discussed here through the example of automobile technology.
Keywords
technics, technology, technological progress, complex technological systems, technological gap, life cycle of complex technological systems
Date of publication
01.04.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1280
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Kondrat'ev N. D., Bol'shie tsikly kon'yunktury i teoriya predvideniya. Izbrannye trudy.Mezhdunarodnyj fond N. D. Kondrat'eva i dr. M.: ZAO Izd-vo «Ehkonomika», 2002. - 767 s. 
 2. Neschadin A. A., Kashin V. K., Lipsits I. V., Vigdorchik E. A. Ehkonomicheskoe razvitie strany i konversiya // Konversiya v mashinostroenii. 2000. № 1. S. 6-20; Glaz'ev S. Yu. Tekhnologicheskie sdvigi v ehkonomike Rossii // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. 1992. T. 33. Vyp. 2.S. 5-25. 
 3. Nanotekhnologii kak klyuchevoj faktor novogo tekhnologicheskogo uklada v ehkonomike // Red.S. Yu. Glaz'ev, V. V. Kharitonov. M.: Trovat, 2009. Glaz'ev S. Vykhod iz khaosa // Voenno-promyshlennyj kur'er. 2014. № 42 (560). S. 1, 3. 
 4. Uvarova L. I. Nauchnyj progress i razrabotki tekhnicheskikh sredstv. M.: Nauka, 1973. 
 5. Fajvush Ya., Arrison V. Samolet bez letchika i upravleniya im po radio. M.: Aviakhim, 1925. 
 6. Burenok V. M. Tekhnologicheskie i tekhnicheskie osnovy razvitiya vooruzheniya i voennoj tekhniki. M.: Granitsa, 2010. S. 216; Aleksandrov V. V. Razvivayuschiesya sistemy. V nauke, tekhnike, obschestve i kul'ture. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGTU, 2000. Ch. 1. Teoriya sistem i sistemnoe modelirovanie. 
 7. Bilinkis V. D. Metody otsenki tekhnicheskogo urovnya i konkurentosposobnosti produktsii.Voronezh: Izd-vo VGTU, 2000. 
 8. Grinyaev S. Tsifrovoe neravenstvo natsij // Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie. 20 yanvarya -5 fevralya 2004 g. № 3 (363). S. 4. 
 9. Tekhniko-ehkonomicheskij analiz mashin i priborov / Red. M. I. Ipatov, V. I. Postnikov.M.: Mashinostroenie, 1985. 
 10. Proskuryakov A. V. Organizatsiya sozdaniya i osvoeniya novoj tekhniki. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1975. 
 11. Dolbenkov V. G. Osnovnye printsipy sozdaniya perspektivnykh raketnykh kompleksov kak slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh sistem // Izvestiya RARAN. 2012. № 3 (73). S. 108-109). 
 12. Ehjres R. Nauchno-tekhnicheskoe prognozirovanie i dolgosrochnoe planirovanie / Red.G. M. Dobrov. M.: Mir, 1971. S. 282-284 
 13. Yanch Eh. Prognozirovanie nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa. M.: Progress, 1974. S. 187-206. 
 14. Smirnov A. D., Maksimov V. F., Akulenok D. N. i dr. Rynochnaya ehkonomika. V 3 t. M.: Somintehk, 1992. T. 2. Chast' 1. Osnovy biznesa. S. 114-117. 
 15. Gutenev V. Funktsii VPK neobkhodimo rasshirit' // Voenno-promyshlennyj kur'er.27 marta - 2 aprelya 2013 g. № 12 (480). S. 4. 
 16. Barabanov M. Kriticheskij vzglyad na GPV-2020 // Voenno-promyshlennyj kur'er. 9-15 yanvarya 2013 g. № 1 (469). S. 6) 
 17. Kosmicheskij korabl' Dragon uspeshno vyshel na orbitu // Aehrokosmicheskoe obozrenie.2006. № 10. S. 12-18. 
 18. Kulikov V. A. Istoriya oruzhiya i vooruzheniya narodov i gosudarstva s drevnejshikh vremen do nashikh dnej. Ufa: Izd-vo «Vostochnyj universitet», 2003. 
 19. Ust'yantsev S. Urok chetvertyj: strategicheskij vybor. «Nasha zadacha sostoit ne v tom, chtoby delat' novye mashiny, a v tom, chtoby povysit' boevye kachestva T-34, uvelichit' ikh vypusk» // Voenno-promyshlennyj kur'er. 2014. № 47 (569). S. 3.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate