Interaction of man and the world in the paradigm of conflictology
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Interaction of man and the world in the paradigm of conflictology
Annotation
PII
S020595920000841-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
N. Leonov 
Occupation: Sc.D. (Psychology), Professor, Head of the Department of Social Psychology and Conflictology
Affiliation: Udmurt Statе University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
109-112
Abstract

The process of human – world interaction is analyzed. It is noted that modern psychology is a system of more or less connected scientific paradigms, each of which expounds certain aspects of human interaction with the world. The article underscores the resource potential and prospects of Russian psychologists ideas. The author highlights the range of problems and contradictions faced by modern researchers in psychology. The possibilities of overcoming these contradictions by the example of actively developing conflictology are presented. The article substantiates the idea that only by integrating with colleagues of the world community, it is possible to create new promising projects, on the one hand, by informing them about the achievements of Russian psychology, on the other hand, mutually enriching. 

Keywords
paradigm, a multi-paradigm approach, communicative methodology, ontology, conflictology, mediation
Received
19.10.2018
Date of publication
02.11.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
641
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1968.

2. Antsupov A.Ya., Shipilov A.I. Konfliktologiya. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2014.

3. Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya sovremennosti: vyzovy neopredelennosti, slozhnosti i raznoobraziya. M.: Federal'nyj institut razvitiya obrazovaniya, 2016.

4. Golovej L.A., Zhuravlev A.L., Tarabrina N.V. B.G. Anan'ev i mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya v psikhologii (K 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2017. T. 38. № 5. S. 108–117.

5. Grishina N.V. Psikhologiya konflikta. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2000.

6. Zhuravlev A.L., Mironenko I.A., Yurevich A.V. Psikhologicheskaya nauka v global'nom mire: vyzovy i perspektivy // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2018. T. 39. № 2. S. 57–70.

7. Karpava A., Torres R. Moja. Irenologiya i sostoyanie izucheniya interkul'turnogo mira // Vestnik udmurtskogo universiteta. 2016. T. 26. Vyp. 4. S. 74–85.

8. Kol'tsova V.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Vvedenie. Unikal'nost' nauchnogo podkhoda B.G. Anan'eva // Metodologiya kollektivnogo chelovekoznaniya i sovremennaya psikhologiya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008. S. 9–13.

9. Leonov N.I. Konfliktologiya. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: NPO “MODEhK”, 2010.

10. Mazilov V.A. Issledovanie sotsial'nykh mirov i kommunikativnaya metodologiya // Sotsial'nyj mir cheloveka: materialy 3 Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Chelovek i mir: sotsial'nye miry izmenyayuschejsya Rossii”, 24–25 iyunya 2010 g. Vyp. 3. Ch. 1 / Pod red. N.I. Leonova. Izhevsk: ERGO, 2010. S. 26–29.

11. Yanchuk V.A. Mezhparadigmal'nyj dialog kak resurs uglubleniya ponimaniya psikhologicheskoj fenomenologii: sotsiokul'turno-interdeterministskaya dialogicheskaya perspektiva // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2012. T. 33. № 1. S. 4–17.

12. Galtung J. Investigaciones teóricas: sociedad y cultura contemporáneas (traducción Victor Pina). Madrid: Tecnos, 1995.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate