Везде
SOME CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE DISCUSSION BETWEEN L.L. KOFANOV AND A.L. SMYSHLYAEV (VDI 2014, NO. 4; 2015, NO. 4; 2016, NO. 2)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
SOME CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE DISCUSSION BETWEEN L.L. KOFANOV AND A.L. SMYSHLYAEV (VDI 2014, NO. 4; 2015, NO. 4; 2016, NO. 2)
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Smorchkov 
ORCID: 0000-0002-4461-4026
Edition
Volume 76 Issue 2 (76)
Pages
422-433
Abstract

The paper reviews problems and results of the discussion (reflected in four articles) between L.L. Kofanov and A.L. Smyshlyayev concerning the role of Roman jurists and their consensual responses in the development of the Roman law.

Keywords
Roman Republic, jurists, priests, honor, ius respondendi, contiones
Date of publication
01.04.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
583
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Gaius, 1904: Gai Institutiones, or Institutes of Roman Law by Gaius. With a transl. and comm. by E. Poste. 4 ed. Oxford.


Gaius, 1997: Institutsii. Knigi 1–4 [Institutiones. Books I–IV. Transl. by F. Dydynskiy; ed. by V.A. Savel’ev, L.L. Kofanov]. Moscow.


Dvoretskiy, I.Kh. 1986: Latinsko-russkiy slovar’. Izd. 3 [Latin-Russian dictionary. 3rd ed.]. Moscow. 


Dozhdev, D.V. 1996: Pimskoe chastnoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Roman private law. A Handbook]. Moscow. 


Dydynskiy, F.M. 1997: Latinsko-russkiy slovar’ k istochnikam rimskogo prava. Po izdaniyu 1896 goda [Latin-Russian dictionary of the sources of Roman law. Based on the 1896 edition]. Moscow. 


Kofanov, L.L. 2014: Rol’ responsa rimskikh yuristov v disputatio forensis v rimskoy grazhdanskoy obshchine V–I vv. do n.e. [The role of responsa of Roman jurists in the disputatio forensis of Roman civil community in 5th–1st centuries BC]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 4, 87–110. 


Kofanov, L.L. 2015: Eshche raz o disputatio fori i responsa prudentium: otvet A.L. Smyshlaevu [Once again about disputatio fori and responsa prudentium: in Reply to A.L. Smyshlyaev ]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 4, 240–256. 


Linderski, J. 1986: Religion aspects of the conflict of the orders. In: K.A. Raaflaub (ed.), Social struggles in archaic Rome. New perspectives on the conflict of the orders. London, 244–261.


Petruchenko, O.A. 1914: Latinsko-russkiy slovar’. Izd. 9-e [Latin-Russian dictionary. 9 ed.]. Moscow. 


Smorchkov, A.M. 2010: Drevnerimskoe zhrechestvo i senat (po povodu kontseptsii R. Mitchella) [The priests of ancient Rome and the senate (on the concept of R. Mitchell)]. In: Indoevropeyskaya istoriya v svete novykh issledovaniy [Indo-European history in the light of new researches]. Moscow, 321–327. 


Smorchkov, A.M. 2012: Religiya i vlast’ v Rimskoy respublike: magistraty, zhretsi, khramy. [Religion and authorities in the Roman Republic: magistrates, priests, temples]. Moscow. 


Smorchkov, A.M. 2014: Konsultatsii zhretsov v sfere publichnogo prava Rimskoy respubliki [Consultations of priests in the sphere of public law of the Roman Republic]. IVS ANTIQVVM. Drevnee pravo [Ancient Law] 1 (29), 38–68.  


Smyshlyaev, A.L. 2014: Eshche raz o disputatio fori i responsa prudentium [Once more on responsa of Roman jurists and disputatio fori]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 4, 110–129. 


Smyshlyaev, A.L. 2016: Kommentariy k stat'e L.L. Kofanova “Eshche raz o disputatio fori i responsa prudentium: otvet A.L. Smyshlyaevu” (VDI. 2015. № 4) [A Commentary on L.L. Kofanov’s paper “Once again about disputatio fori and responsa prudentium: in reply to A.L. Smyshlyaev” (VDI 2015, no. 4)]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 410–421. 

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate