RAS History & PhilologyАзия и Африка сегодня Asia and Africa Today

  • ISSN (Print) 0321-5075
  • ISSN (Online) 2782-2389

Qualia irreducibility thesis: rational argument or unreasonable presupposition

PII
S1811-833X0000617-8-1
DOI
10.7868/SX0000617-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Abstract
The article discusses the possibility of a naturalistic explanation of phenomenal experience (qualia). It starts with the analysis of one of the thought experiments described by D. Chalmers in his book “The Conscious Mind. In search of a fundamental theory”, namely, a zombie experiment. The article shows that the conclusions of this experiment can be recognized as correct only provided that the experimenter imagines a complete functional analogue of a human being. However, this condition is not feasible, since the experimenter is required to possess the totality of knowledge about the imaginary creature. Experimenter’s imagination is in one way or another determined by the available conceptual schemes. It is concluded that the thesis of the irreducibility of qualia, based on the data of thought experiments, is a presupposition of conscious mind studies, and not their conclusion. From my point of view, this presupposition can be challenged just as N.I. Lobachevsky challenged the intuitive plausibility of Euclid’s fifth axiom. As an alternative understanding of the nature of qualia I propose J. McDowell's approach, which is called “perceptual conceptualism”.
Keywords
phenomenal experience, qualia, philosophical zombie, David Chalmers, perceptual conceptualism, John McDowell
Date of publication
01.12.2020
Year of publication
2020
Number of purchasers
11
Views
548

References

QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library