RAS History & PhilologyАзия и Африка сегодня Asia and Africa Today

  • ISSN (Print) 0321-5075
  • ISSN (Online) 2782-2389

US in Nepal: Real Aid or a Geopolitical Trap?

PII
S27822389S0321507525070077-1
DOI
10.7868/S2782238925070077
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 7
Pages
55-62
Abstract
Nepal is one of the least developed landlocked states, which has always depended on international aid, with the US being one of its main donors. Since the mid-2010s, a $500 million grant from the Millennium Challenge Corporation, the largest in Nepal’s history, has become the “flagship” project of bilateral cooperation. The 2017 agreement provoked mixed reactions among Nepali society and elites, who believed that several of its provisions violated national sovereignty and forced the state to act in accordance with the US Indo-Pacific Strategy. Despite assurances from Washington, ratification of the agreement took nearly 5 years and was achieved only due to US pressure. For now, it is difficult to assess the consequences of accepting American aid for Nepal, but it is safe to say that its southern neighbour India is the biggest beneficiary.
Keywords
Непал США помощь Индо-Тихоокеанская стратегия США корпорация «Вызовы тысячелетия» Индия балансирование
Date of publication
09.06.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
3

References

  1. 1. Ледков А.А., Лунев С.И. История Непала. XX век. Москва: Институт востоковедения РАН, 2011. 384 c. Ledkov A.A., Lunev S.I. 2011. History of Nepal. 20th Century. Moscow. 164 p. (In Russ.)
  2. 2. Яковлев Г.И. Экономическое развитие Непала (1951–1965). Москва: Изд-во «Наука», 1970. 164 с. @@Yakovlev G.I. 1970. Economic Development of Nepal (1951–1965). Moscow. 164 p. (In Russ.)
  3. 3. Skerry C.A., Moran K., Calavan K.M. 1991. Four Decades of Development. The History of U.S. Assistance to Nepal 1951–1991. Kathmandu: USAID. 389 p.
  4. 4. Lamichhane D.P. 2023. American Engagement with Nepal: Concerns of China and India. Unity Journal, 4 (01), pp. 280–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/unityj.v4i01.52246
  5. 5. Александров М.А., Грановский А.Е. Экономическая помощь капиталистических государств странам Южной Азии. Москва: Изд-во «Наука», 1973. 383 с. @@Aleksandrov M.A., Granovsky A.E. 1973. Economic aid of capitalist countries to South Asia. Moscow. 383 p. (In Russ.)
  6. 6. Khadka N. 2000. US aid to Nepal in the Cold War Period: Lessons for the Future. Pacific Affairs, 73 (1) (Spring), pp. 77–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2672285
  7. 7. Лунев С.И. Регионализация и интеграция: Индия и Южная Азия. Москва: Юрайт, 2019. 305 с. @@Lunev S.I. 2019. Regionalisation and Integration: India and South Asia. Moscow. 305 p. (In Russ.)
  8. 8. Nayak N.R. 2014. Strategic Himalayas: Republican Nepal and External Powers. New Delhi: Pentagon Press and Institute of Defense Studies and Analyses. 232 p.
  9. 9. Бартенев В.И. Президентские инициативы как инструмент управления политикой США по оказанию международной помощи в XXI веке: от Джорджа Буша-младшего до Джозефа Байдена. Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV. Международные отношения и мировая политика. 2022. № 14 (1), С. 64–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2022-14-1-64-113 @@Bartenev V.I. 2022. Presidential initiatives as a tool to manage U.S. foreign assistance policies in the XXI century: from George W. Bush to Joseph R. Biden. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics. Vol. 14, № 1. Pp. 64–113. Moscow. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.48015/2076-7404-2022-14-1-64-113
  10. 10. Кобонбаев М. Содружество Независимых Государств в критериях фонда «Вызовы тысячелетия»: главное – эффективное управление. Центральная Азия и Кавказ. 2006. № 2 (44). С. 122–137. @@Kobonbaev M. 2006. CIS in criteria of “Millennuim Challenge” foundation: main issue – effective governance. Central Asia and Caucasus. № 2 (44). Pp. 122–137. (In Russ.)
  11. 11. Shekhawat S. BRI in Nepal: An Appraisal. Observer Research Foundation. 10.06.2014. https://orfonline.org/research/bri-in-nepal-an-appraisal (accessed 24.10.2024)
  12. 12. Adhikary A. 2022. Millennium Challenge Corporation: Interpretations and Implications for the National Security of Nepal. Unity Journal. Vol. III. Pp. 40–50.
  13. 13. Shekhawat S. 2025. The MCC Debate and U.S.-Nepal Ties in Flux. Observer Research Foundation Issue Brief. Iss. 793. 25 p.
  14. 14. Yin Q. MCC as a Tool of American Influence on Developing Countries. Мировая политика. 2022. № 4. С. 46–57. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2022.4.39171
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library